DESCRIBING THE INDESCRIBABLE: CALLIMACHUS, <i>IAMBUS</i> 6 AND PHIDIAS’ STATUE OF ZEUS

Abstract In Iambus 6 Callimachus describes Phidias’ statue of Zeus to a friend of his about to leave for Olympia. However, as can be inferred from the Diegesis and the fragmentary text of the iambus, the poet does not elaborate on the statue’s iconography, nor does he mention the impression which it made on the viewers within the temple setting. Instead, he focusses solely on its measurements and technical details. This article sheds new light on this much-debated poem by exploring its playful and humorous tones within the broader context of Callimachus’ poetical and aesthetic principles. It argues that Callimachus deliberately avoided providing a literary ekphrasis of Phidias’ Zeus akin to other known examples of Hellenistic ekphrasis and to other ekphraseis of divine statues which Callimachus offered in the Iambi and the Aetia . By doing this, he avoided crafting a too loudly resounding poem, thereby adhering to his own poetical and aesthetic credo.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Classical Quarterly
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838824000879
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DESCRIBING THE INDESCRIBABLE: CALLIMACHUS, IAMBUS 6 AND PHIDIAS’ STATUE OF ZEUS

Antonio Papapicco
The Classical Quarterly
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

DESCRIBING THE INDESCRIBABLE: CALLIMACHUS, IAMBUS 6 AND PHIDIAS’ STATUE OF ZEUS

Antonio Papapicco
article en

Abstract

Abstract In Iambus 6 Callimachus describes Phidias’ statue of Zeus to a friend of his about to leave for Olympia. However, as can be inferred from the Diegesis and the fragmentary text of the iambus, the poet does not elaborate on the statue’s iconography, nor does he mention the impression which it made on the viewers within the temple setting. Instead, he focusses solely on its measurements and technical details. This article sheds new light on this much-debated poem by exploring its playful and humorous tones within the broader context of Callimachus’ poetical and aesthetic principles. It argues that Callimachus deliberately avoided providing a literary ekphrasis of Phidias’ Zeus akin to other known examples of Hellenistic ekphrasis and to other ekphraseis of divine statues which Callimachus offered in the Iambi and the Aetia . By doing this, he avoided crafting a too loudly resounding poem, thereby adhering to his own poetical and aesthetic credo.

The Classical Quarterly
Scuola Normale Superiore (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

DESCRIBING THE INDESCRIBABLE: CALLIMACHUS, <i>IAMBUS</i> 6 AND PHIDIAS’ STATUE OF ZEUS — Antonio Papapicco · The Classical Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS