Improving BIM Design Governance in South Korea through a Comparative Analysis of BIM Design Guidelines of Domestic and Foreign Public Institutions

Purpose: This study aims to improve BIM design governance in Korea by analyzing and comparing BIM design guidelines from domestic and overseas public institutions. While Korean guidelines mainly focus on deliverables and review processes, those from countries with mature BIM adoption emphasize collaboration and data exchange.<br/>Method: To identify key differences in BIM governance, the research examined guidelines from four Korean public organizations alongside those from the US, UK, Australia, and Singapore. The analysis focuses on key governance components such as team collaboration, data compliance, project execution frameworks, and life-cycle information management. Result: Findings reveal that while international guidelines prioritize integrated collaboration, open standards, and communication workflows, Korean guidelines remain centered on institutional mandates and documentation requirements. The study highlights the need to shift Korean BIM design governance from outcome-centered evaluation to process-oriented collaboration. These research findings provide direction for restructuring BIM design guidelines to enhance design efficiency and interoperability. Future research will verify theoretical insights through empirical analysis of BIM practices and examine cross-national legal and cultural factors to clarify the global applicability of design guidelines.