Non-papillary, prone approach for endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: our experience

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted in order to assess the safety and efficacy of non-papillary prone endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) for patients with urolithiasis.METHODS: The surgeries were performed at a high-volume tertiary center. This retrospective study includes 83 patients who underwent ECIRS between February 2019 and March 2025. The inclusion criteria for ECIRS included complex stones, multiple stones in different calyces, and staghorn calculi. The procedures were conducted by two highly-experienced surgeons. The average patient age was 53.96 years, with a mean stone diameter of 40.33 mm. Nonpapillary puncture was performed and either a 22Fr (mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy [PCNL]) or 30Fr (standard PCNL) access was implemented.RESULTS: The average operative time was 50.92 minutes, with a final stone-free rate (SFR) of 89.2%. Postoperative complications were observed in 14.5% of the patients, all classified as Grade II, with temporary fever and bleeding being the most common. Comparisons between mini-PCNL (22Fr) and standard PCNL (30Fr) revealed no statistically significant differences in operative time, hemoglobin drop, SFR, or complication rates.CONCLUSIONS: Non-papillary prone ECIRS continues to be a feasible,safe and efficient approach for patients with complex stone disease and anatomical abnormalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hellenic Urology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23736/s2241-9136.25.00092-1
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-papillary, prone approach for endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: our experience

Theofanis Vrettos, Arman Tsaturyan, Theodoros Spinos, Athanasios Vagionis et al.
Hellenic Urology
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Non-papillary, prone approach for endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: our experience

Theofanis Vrettos, Arman Tsaturyan, Theodoros Spinos, Athanasios Vagionis, EVANGELOS N. LIATSIKOS, Angelis Peteinaris, Begoña Ballesta Martínez, Fotios Michalopoulos, Solon Faitatziadis, Mohammad M. Obaidat, Spyridon POLIZONIS
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted in order to assess the safety and efficacy of non-papillary prone endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) for patients with urolithiasis.METHODS: The surgeries were performed at a high-volume tertiary center. This retrospective study includes 83 patients who underwent ECIRS between February 2019 and March 2025. The inclusion criteria for ECIRS included complex stones, multiple stones in different calyces, and staghorn calculi. The procedures were conducted by two highly-experienced surgeons. The average patient age was 53.96 years, with a mean stone diameter of 40.33 mm. Nonpapillary puncture was performed and either a 22Fr (mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy [PCNL]) or 30Fr (standard PCNL) access was implemented.RESULTS: The average operative time was 50.92 minutes, with a final stone-free rate (SFR) of 89.2%. Postoperative complications were observed in 14.5% of the patients, all classified as Grade II, with temporary fever and bleeding being the most common. Comparisons between mini-PCNL (22Fr) and standard PCNL (30Fr) revealed no statistically significant differences in operative time, hemoglobin drop, SFR, or complication rates.CONCLUSIONS: Non-papillary prone ECIRS continues to be a feasible,safe and efficient approach for patients with complex stone disease and anatomical abnormalities.

Hellenic UrologyVol. 37(4)
University of Patras (GR), Erebouni Medical Center (AM), Hospital Universitario del Vinalopó (ES), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.