“Creating Something from Nothing”: Xinjiang Genocide as a Political Stratagem

A number of politicians, media, NGOs, and separatist groups claim that China's government has been committing genocide in Xinjiang. Genocide is “the crime of crimes,” yet these claims often contradict its legal definition and fail to show guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Most do not present a prima facie case of genocide’s sine qua non , the intent to destroy a protected group. Instead, they use the assertion as a stratagem, to enhance the claimant’s position in an inter-state conflict or intra-state ethnic strife. Claims about China’s Xinjiang are not based on any mass killings, but on the bloodless enforcement of birth limits for minorities in 2017–2021—featuring practices that China’s Han majority experienced for decades—plus temporary family separations of some minority children and alleged forced intermarriages. Examining these and other claims, which impel Western sanctions and incite anti-Chinese sentiment, we find them empirically unsound and degrading of the legal and common concepts of genocide. A longer version of this article, with a more comprehensive critical scholarly apparatus supporting these claims, can be found at https://scienceandsociety.com/bsautman.htm .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science & Society
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00368237251359248
Citations
1
Primary Topic
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Creating Something from Nothing”: Xinjiang Genocide as a Political Stratagem

Barry Sautman
1 citations
Science & Society
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
4.20
article

“Creating Something from Nothing”: Xinjiang Genocide as a Political Stratagem

Barry Sautman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A number of politicians, media, NGOs, and separatist groups claim that China's government has been committing genocide in Xinjiang. Genocide is “the crime of crimes,” yet these claims often contradict its legal definition and fail to show guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Most do not present a prima facie case of genocide’s sine qua non , the intent to destroy a protected group. Instead, they use the assertion as a stratagem, to enhance the claimant’s position in an inter-state conflict or intra-state ethnic strife. Claims about China’s Xinjiang are not based on any mass killings, but on the bloodless enforcement of birth limits for minorities in 2017–2021—featuring practices that China’s Han majority experienced for decades—plus temporary family separations of some minority children and alleged forced intermarriages. Examining these and other claims, which impel Western sanctions and incite anti-Chinese sentiment, we find them empirically unsound and degrading of the legal and common concepts of genocide. A longer version of this article, with a more comprehensive critical scholarly apparatus supporting these claims, can be found at https://scienceandsociety.com/bsautman.htm .

Science & SocietyVol. 89(4)
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Creating Something from Nothing”: Xinjiang Genocide as a Political Stratagem — Barry Sautman · Science & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS