Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolar Teeth Restored with Glass Ionomer Cement, Glass Ionomer Cement with Fibres and Nanoceramic Composite Restorative Material: An In-vitro Study

Introduction: Restoring endodontically treated maxillary premolars is challenging due to their weakened state from caries, trauma, and the endodontic access itself, making them prone to fracture. Long-term success hinges on their ability to withstand biting forces. The core build-up, replacing lost tooth structure, is crucial. The restorative materials chosen for both the core and final crown significantly influence the tooth’s overall fracture resistance, as their mechanical properties dictate stress response. Aim: To evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC), GIC with fibres and nanoceramic composite restorative material. Materials and Methods: The present in-vitro study included eighty maxillary premolar teeth which were extracted due to orthodontic purpose were collected and divided into four groups with 20 teeth in each group. Group I was noted as negative control with no preparation. Groups II, III and IV were restored with GIC, GIC with fibres and with nanoceramic composite, respectively. After restoration, the samples were subjected to evaluation of fracture resistance by using universal testing machine and values were subjected to statistical analysis. Results: The highest fracture resistance of 913.858 N(newtons) was noted for nanoceramic composite. There was no statistically significant difference observed between Groups III and IV (p=0.9870); however, both groups exhibited higher fracture resistance compared to Group II. Conclusion: The fracture resistance with fibre reinforcement was higher than conventional CIC and similar to that of nanoceramic composite.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2025/80784.21488
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolar Teeth Restored with Glass Ionomer Cement, Glass Ionomer Cement with Fibres and Nanoceramic Composite Restorative Material: An In-vitro Study

Bharat Mishra, Ravichandra Ravi, Sri Naagaja Krishnaveni Komireddy, Devang Naik et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Dental materials and restorations
article

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolar Teeth Restored with Glass Ionomer Cement, Glass Ionomer Cement with Fibres and Nanoceramic Composite Restorative Material: An In-vitro Study

Bharat Mishra, Ravichandra Ravi, Sri Naagaja Krishnaveni Komireddy, Devang Naik, Sruthi Kapu, Lalitha Sri Roja
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Restoring endodontically treated maxillary premolars is challenging due to their weakened state from caries, trauma, and the endodontic access itself, making them prone to fracture. Long-term success hinges on their ability to withstand biting forces. The core build-up, replacing lost tooth structure, is crucial. The restorative materials chosen for both the core and final crown significantly influence the tooth’s overall fracture resistance, as their mechanical properties dictate stress response. Aim: To evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC), GIC with fibres and nanoceramic composite restorative material. Materials and Methods: The present in-vitro study included eighty maxillary premolar teeth which were extracted due to orthodontic purpose were collected and divided into four groups with 20 teeth in each group. Group I was noted as negative control with no preparation. Groups II, III and IV were restored with GIC, GIC with fibres and with nanoceramic composite, respectively. After restoration, the samples were subjected to evaluation of fracture resistance by using universal testing machine and values were subjected to statistical analysis. Results: The highest fracture resistance of 913.858 N(newtons) was noted for nanoceramic composite. There was no statistically significant difference observed between Groups III and IV (p=0.9870); however, both groups exhibited higher fracture resistance compared to Group II. Conclusion: The fracture resistance with fibre reinforcement was higher than conventional CIC and similar to that of nanoceramic composite.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.