The Professionalisation of Foster Care in Norway

In Norway, as elsewhere, child welfare services have long prioritised placing children in foster homes over residential care when children cannot live with their parents, to ensure upbringing in family settings. Today, it is also stated in the law that child welfare services must always consider whether anyone in the child’s family or close network could be chosen as foster parents. The idea has been that kinship foster care can safeguard the child’s cultural identity, continuity in social networks, and family connections. Parallel with the prioritisation of foster care and kinship foster care, foster care has become increasingly professionalised. In the Norwegian context, the possible unintended consequences of increased professionalisation have been minimally addressed. This article aims to contribute to vitalising this discussion about some of the unintended consequences professionalisation may have for safeguarding the values associated with foster care in general, and particularly for kinship foster care. For our discussion, focusing particularly on economic conditions, we draw on both our own and others’ research related to foster care. Using concepts from sociological theory on different rationalities or logics as a basis for action, we illustrate and discuss how instrumental rationality and the field logic of child welfare have increasingly influenced the conditions for foster homes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Inclusion
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.10604
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Professionalisation of Foster Care in Norway

Jeanette Skoglund, Renee Thørnblad
1 citations
Social Inclusion
Child Welfare and Adoption
2.37
article

The Professionalisation of Foster Care in Norway

Jeanette Skoglund, Renee Thørnblad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In Norway, as elsewhere, child welfare services have long prioritised placing children in foster homes over residential care when children cannot live with their parents, to ensure upbringing in family settings. Today, it is also stated in the law that child welfare services must always consider whether anyone in the child’s family or close network could be chosen as foster parents. The idea has been that kinship foster care can safeguard the child’s cultural identity, continuity in social networks, and family connections. Parallel with the prioritisation of foster care and kinship foster care, foster care has become increasingly professionalised. In the Norwegian context, the possible unintended consequences of increased professionalisation have been minimally addressed. This article aims to contribute to vitalising this discussion about some of the unintended consequences professionalisation may have for safeguarding the values associated with foster care in general, and particularly for kinship foster care. For our discussion, focusing particularly on economic conditions, we draw on both our own and others’ research related to foster care. Using concepts from sociological theory on different rationalities or logics as a basis for action, we illustrate and discuss how instrumental rationality and the field logic of child welfare have increasingly influenced the conditions for foster homes.

Social InclusionVol. 13
UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Child Welfare and Adoption
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Professionalisation of Foster Care in Norway — Jeanette Skoglund, Renee Thørnblad · Social Inclusion (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS