Husserl’s Early Metaphysics in the Light of Modern Research

To date, there is no unambiguous opinion on the issue of understanding metaphysics in Husserl’s phenomenology. There are several sustainable approaches to addressing this issue. The choice of approach depends on how metaphysics is understood and what period is taken as the basis for the study. The problems of this article are initiated by a dispute between different approaches and the fact that in recent years the early stage of Husserl’s philosophy has been considered as nonmetaphysical. The main purpose of the article is to find answers to the questions: why there are different interpretations of understanding metaphysics in Husserl’s phenomenology and how authentic they are to the statements of Husserl himself. The question is raised: How true is the statement that “metaphysics in a new sense” arises only in the late period of Husserl’s work? Do we not find similar arguments already in the early work of the philosopher? In search of answers, the author suggests once again raising the question of Husserl’s proper understanding of metaphysics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
History of Philosophy
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2025-30-1-40-52
Primary Topic
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Husserl’s Early Metaphysics in the Light of Modern Research

Tatyana Terentieva
History of Philosophy
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
article

Husserl’s Early Metaphysics in the Light of Modern Research

Tatyana Terentieva
article en

Abstract

To date, there is no unambiguous opinion on the issue of understanding metaphysics in Husserl’s phenomenology. There are several sustainable approaches to addressing this issue. The choice of approach depends on how metaphysics is understood and what period is taken as the basis for the study. The problems of this article are initiated by a dispute between different approaches and the fact that in recent years the early stage of Husserl’s philosophy has been considered as nonmetaphysical. The main purpose of the article is to find answers to the questions: why there are different interpretations of understanding metaphysics in Husserl’s phenomenology and how authentic they are to the statements of Husserl himself. The question is raised: How true is the statement that “metaphysics in a new sense” arises only in the late period of Husserl’s work? Do we not find similar arguments already in the early work of the philosopher? In search of answers, the author suggests once again raising the question of Husserl’s proper understanding of metaphysics.

History of PhilosophyVol. 30(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Husserl’s Early Metaphysics in the Light of Modern Research — Tatyana Terentieva · History of Philosophy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS