Equilibrium Causal Models: Connecting Dynamical Systems Modeling and Cross-Sectional Data Analysis

Many psychological phenomena can be understood as arising from systems of causally connected components that evolve over time within an individual. In current empirical practice, researchers frequently study these systems by fitting statistical models to data collected at a single moment in time, that is, cross-sectional data. This raises a central question: Can cross-sectional data analysis ever yield causal insights into systems that evolve over time-and if so, under what conditions? In this paper, we address this question by introducing Equilibrium Causal Models (ECMs) to the psychological literature. ECMs are causal abstractions of an underlying dynamical system that allow for inferences about the long-term effects of interventions, permit cyclic causal relations, and can in principle be estimated from cross-sectional data, as long as information about the resting state of the system is captured by those measurements. We explain the conditions under which ECM estimation is possible, show that they allow researchers to learn about within-person processes from cross-sectional data, and discuss how tools from both the psychological measurement modeling and the causal discovery literature can inform the ways in which researchers collect and analyze their data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multivariate Behavioral Research
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2025.2522733
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equilibrium Causal Models: Connecting Dynamical Systems Modeling and Cross-Sectional Data Analysis

Fabian Dablander, Oisín Ryan
1 citations
Multivariate Behavioral Research
Mental Health Research Topics
2.12
article

Equilibrium Causal Models: Connecting Dynamical Systems Modeling and Cross-Sectional Data Analysis

Fabian Dablander, Oisín Ryan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Many psychological phenomena can be understood as arising from systems of causally connected components that evolve over time within an individual. In current empirical practice, researchers frequently study these systems by fitting statistical models to data collected at a single moment in time, that is, cross-sectional data. This raises a central question: Can cross-sectional data analysis ever yield causal insights into systems that evolve over time-and if so, under what conditions? In this paper, we address this question by introducing Equilibrium Causal Models (ECMs) to the psychological literature. ECMs are causal abstractions of an underlying dynamical system that allow for inferences about the long-term effects of interventions, permit cyclic causal relations, and can in principle be estimated from cross-sectional data, as long as information about the resting state of the system is captured by those measurements. We explain the conditions under which ECM estimation is possible, show that they allow researchers to learn about within-person processes from cross-sectional data, and discuss how tools from both the psychological measurement modeling and the causal discovery literature can inform the ways in which researchers collect and analyze their data.

Multivariate Behavioral ResearchVol. 60(6)
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Mental Health Research Topics
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.