Genetic analysis of <i>Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale</i> isolates: an Australian perspective

This study examined the genetic diversity in a collection of field isolates of <i>Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale</i> and compared that with the diversity in the serovars A-D and F-I reference strains and available whole genome sequences. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene of the nine Australian isolates and twelve sequences of overseas isolates resulted in six clusters with the Australian isolates not closely related to either the type strain or the serovar reference strains. The suitability of low-cost finger printing techniques, ERIC-PCR and rep-PCR, when applied to <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> were also evaluated. The fingerprints generated through ERIC-PCR were more informative and this method subsequently used to examine the genetic diversity of the isolates and the reference strains. The ERIC-PCR patterns confirmed the isolates and strains were quite diverse, with 15 different patterns detected. These results suggested that the Australian isolates were genetically distinct from the overseas strains, consistent with the genetic distinction observed in the phylogenetic study. Whole genome sequences of the Australian isolate BR2963 and the 15 genomes identified as <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> in the Genome Taxonomy Database confirmed that serovars F, K and M form a cluster distinct from other <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> and probably represent a distinct species within the genus <i>Ornithobacterium</i>. Additionally, the Australian isolate BR2963 had an average nucleotide identity level with the <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> type strain (DSM15997<sup>T</sup>) below the accepted 95% threshold for species suggesting that the isolate is a member of the genus <i>Ornithobacterium</i> but not within the species <i>rhinotracheale</i>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Avian Pathology
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2025.2552314
Primary Topic
Microbial infections and disease research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic analysis of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale isolates: an Australian perspective

Sean W. Bisset, Peter Scott, Muhammad Noman Naseem, P. J. Blackall et al.
Avian Pathology
Microbial infections and disease research
article

Genetic analysis of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale isolates: an Australian perspective

Sean W. Bisset, Peter Scott, Muhammad Noman Naseem, P. J. Blackall, Lida Omaleki, Loan Nguyen, Arif Anwar, Conny Turni, Zi Ming Heng
article en

Abstract

This study examined the genetic diversity in a collection of field isolates of <i>Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale</i> and compared that with the diversity in the serovars A-D and F-I reference strains and available whole genome sequences. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene of the nine Australian isolates and twelve sequences of overseas isolates resulted in six clusters with the Australian isolates not closely related to either the type strain or the serovar reference strains. The suitability of low-cost finger printing techniques, ERIC-PCR and rep-PCR, when applied to <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> were also evaluated. The fingerprints generated through ERIC-PCR were more informative and this method subsequently used to examine the genetic diversity of the isolates and the reference strains. The ERIC-PCR patterns confirmed the isolates and strains were quite diverse, with 15 different patterns detected. These results suggested that the Australian isolates were genetically distinct from the overseas strains, consistent with the genetic distinction observed in the phylogenetic study. Whole genome sequences of the Australian isolate BR2963 and the 15 genomes identified as <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> in the Genome Taxonomy Database confirmed that serovars F, K and M form a cluster distinct from other <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> and probably represent a distinct species within the genus <i>Ornithobacterium</i>. Additionally, the Australian isolate BR2963 had an average nucleotide identity level with the <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> type strain (DSM15997<sup>T</sup>) below the accepted 95% threshold for species suggesting that the isolate is a member of the genus <i>Ornithobacterium</i> but not within the species <i>rhinotracheale</i>.

Avian PathologyVol. 55(1)
The University of Queensland (AU), China Animal Disease Control Center (CN), Agriculture and Food (AU), Agriculture Victoria Services (Australia) (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Microbial infections and disease research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.