Abolition and Social Work: Dismantling Carceral Logics to Build Systems of Care

Social work has historically operated as an extension of the carceral state, embedding policing, surveillance, and punishment into youth-serving institutions under the guise of care. This paper examines carceral seepage—the infiltration of punitive logics into social work practice—across child welfare, education, and juvenile legal, revealing how these systems function as interconnected circuits of criminalization rather than support. Using abolitionist frameworks, we critique social work’s complicity in punitive interventions and address common concerns about safety, scalability, and sustainability. Instead of reforming oppressive institutions, we argue for a fundamental transformation of social work, advocating for non-carceral models such as community-led crisis response, restorative justice, and mutual aid. By divesting from punishment and investing in collective care, abolitionist social work can move beyond harm reduction and toward genuine liberation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14090535
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abolition and Social Work: Dismantling Carceral Logics to Build Systems of Care

Rebecca Lynn Davis, Brittany Ribeiro Brown, Durrell M. Washington, Diana Ballesteros
Social Sciences
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Abolition and Social Work: Dismantling Carceral Logics to Build Systems of Care

Rebecca Lynn Davis, Brittany Ribeiro Brown, Durrell M. Washington, Diana Ballesteros
article en

Abstract

Social work has historically operated as an extension of the carceral state, embedding policing, surveillance, and punishment into youth-serving institutions under the guise of care. This paper examines carceral seepage—the infiltration of punitive logics into social work practice—across child welfare, education, and juvenile legal, revealing how these systems function as interconnected circuits of criminalization rather than support. Using abolitionist frameworks, we critique social work’s complicity in punitive interventions and address common concerns about safety, scalability, and sustainability. Instead of reforming oppressive institutions, we argue for a fundamental transformation of social work, advocating for non-carceral models such as community-led crisis response, restorative justice, and mutual aid. By divesting from punishment and investing in collective care, abolitionist social work can move beyond harm reduction and toward genuine liberation.

Social SciencesVol. 14(9)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), Portland State University (US), City University of New York (US), University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.