Comparison of Korea and Japan’s Architectural Rock Development-Related Legislation and Implications

In Korea, architectural rock development is managed under the Mountain Management Act and the Stone Industry Promotion Act.However, questions have been raised regarding the effectiveness of these laws in clearly defining rock resources, determining ownership forms, managing quarrying fees and environmental restoration costs, and supervising on-site operations.This study reviewed the structure, main contents, and issues of the domestic legal system related to architectural rock development and analyzed comparable systems in Japan, given its similar economic, industrial, and legal structures.Based on this comparative analysis, recommendations for improving Korea's legal system include integrating the existing separate acts into a single comprehensive act, explicitly defining stone ownership and its timing, establishing property rights for stone mining, reviewing the introduction of exploration permits, adjusting the duration of stone mining rights, and concretization of the calculation criteria and procedures for collecting stone mining fees.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32390/ksmer.2025.62.4.439
Primary Topic
Cultural and Historical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Korea and Japan’s Architectural Rock Development-Related Legislation and Implications

Kwon-Hong Ryu, Deahyung Kim, Yujeong Kim
Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
Cultural and Historical Studies
article

Comparison of Korea and Japan’s Architectural Rock Development-Related Legislation and Implications

Kwon-Hong Ryu, Deahyung Kim, Yujeong Kim
article en

Abstract

In Korea, architectural rock development is managed under the Mountain Management Act and the Stone Industry Promotion Act.However, questions have been raised regarding the effectiveness of these laws in clearly defining rock resources, determining ownership forms, managing quarrying fees and environmental restoration costs, and supervising on-site operations.This study reviewed the structure, main contents, and issues of the domestic legal system related to architectural rock development and analyzed comparable systems in Japan, given its similar economic, industrial, and legal structures.Based on this comparative analysis, recommendations for improving Korea's legal system include integrating the existing separate acts into a single comprehensive act, explicitly defining stone ownership and its timing, establishing property rights for stone mining, reviewing the introduction of exploration permits, adjusting the duration of stone mining rights, and concretization of the calculation criteria and procedures for collecting stone mining fees.

Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources EngineersVol. 62(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Cultural and Historical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Korea and Japan’s Architectural Rock Development-Related Legislation and Implications — Kwon-Hong Ryu, Deahyung Kim, et al. · Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS