The role of anchor investors in initial public offerings

Abstract Do capital market regulations improve the efficiency of allocation of capital to IPO firms? We answer this question by examining a regulation in India that allows IPO firms to seek investment from lead (anchor) institutional investors. Using a sample of 158 anchor investor‐backed IPOs and 689 non‐anchor IPOs from 2006 to 2020, we find that anchor‐backed IPO firms are more profitable and sell at higher valuations. These IPOs raise more equity than non‐anchor firms, and anchor‐backed firms with higher productivity of capital raise more equity than other firms. We find that anchor‐backed IPOs experience a significant improvement in profitability and Q over 4 years after the IPO. Anchor backing is associated with a lower probability of the stock being downgraded to lower categories of listing and less illiquidity. Our results suggest that capital market regulations can be effective in directing capital to firms with higher investment efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Finance
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.70040
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of anchor investors in initial public offerings

Shalu Kalra, S Vishwanatha, Ankit Singhal
International Review of Finance
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

The role of anchor investors in initial public offerings

Shalu Kalra, S Vishwanatha, Ankit Singhal
article en

Abstract

Abstract Do capital market regulations improve the efficiency of allocation of capital to IPO firms? We answer this question by examining a regulation in India that allows IPO firms to seek investment from lead (anchor) institutional investors. Using a sample of 158 anchor investor‐backed IPOs and 689 non‐anchor IPOs from 2006 to 2020, we find that anchor‐backed IPO firms are more profitable and sell at higher valuations. These IPOs raise more equity than non‐anchor firms, and anchor‐backed firms with higher productivity of capital raise more equity than other firms. We find that anchor‐backed IPOs experience a significant improvement in profitability and Q over 4 years after the IPO. Anchor backing is associated with a lower probability of the stock being downgraded to lower categories of listing and less illiquidity. Our results suggest that capital market regulations can be effective in directing capital to firms with higher investment efficiency.

International Review of FinanceVol. 25(3)
Mahindra Group (India) (IN), Shiv Nadar University (IN), Mahindra University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.