Comparison of Wearable and Depth-Sensing Technologies with Electronic Walkway for Comprehensive Gait Analysis

Accurate and scalable gait assessment is essential for clinical and research applications, including fall risk evaluation, rehabilitation monitoring, and early detection of neurodegenerative diseases. While electronic walkways remain the clinical gold standard, their high cost and limited portability restrict widespread use. Wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) and markerless depth cameras have emerged as promising alternatives; however, prior studies have typically assessed these systems under tightly controlled conditions, with single participants in view, limited marker sets, and without direct cross-technology comparisons. This study addresses these gaps by simultaneously evaluating three sensing technologies-APDM wearable IMUs (tested in two separate configurations: foot-mounted and lumbar-mounted) and the Azure Kinect depth camera-against ProtoKinetics Zeno™ Walkway Gait Analysis System in a realistic clinical environment where multiple individuals were present in the camera's field of view. Gait data from 20 older adults (mean age 70.06±9.45 years) performing Single-Task and Dual-Task walking trials were synchronously captured using custom hardware for precise temporal alignment. Eleven gait markers spanning macro, micro-temporal, micro-spatial, and spatiotemporal domains were compared using mean absolute error (MAE), Pearson correlation (<i>r</i>), and Bland-Altman analysis. Foot-mounted IMUs demonstrated the highest accuracy (MAE =0.00-6.12, r=0.92-1.00), followed closely by the Azure Kinect (MAE =0.01-6.07, r=0.68-0.98). Lumbar-mounted IMUs showed consistently lower agreement with the reference system. These findings provide the first comprehensive comparison of wearable and depth-sensing technologies with a clinical gold standard under real-world conditions and across an extensive set of gait markers. The results establish a foundation for deploying scalable, low-cost gait assessment systems in diverse healthcare contexts, supporting early detection, mobility monitoring, and rehabilitation outcomes across multiple patient populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25175501
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gait Recognition and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Wearable and Depth-Sensing Technologies with Electronic Walkway for Comprehensive Gait Analysis

Behnaz Ghoraani, Amie Rosenfeld, Magdalena Ioana Tolea, Marjan Nassajpour et al.
3 citations
Sensors
Gait Recognition and Analysis
2.02
article

Comparison of Wearable and Depth-Sensing Technologies with Electronic Walkway for Comprehensive Gait Analysis

Behnaz Ghoraani, Amie Rosenfeld, Magdalena Ioana Tolea, Marjan Nassajpour, James E. Galvin, Mahmoud Seifallahi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Accurate and scalable gait assessment is essential for clinical and research applications, including fall risk evaluation, rehabilitation monitoring, and early detection of neurodegenerative diseases. While electronic walkways remain the clinical gold standard, their high cost and limited portability restrict widespread use. Wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) and markerless depth cameras have emerged as promising alternatives; however, prior studies have typically assessed these systems under tightly controlled conditions, with single participants in view, limited marker sets, and without direct cross-technology comparisons. This study addresses these gaps by simultaneously evaluating three sensing technologies-APDM wearable IMUs (tested in two separate configurations: foot-mounted and lumbar-mounted) and the Azure Kinect depth camera-against ProtoKinetics Zeno™ Walkway Gait Analysis System in a realistic clinical environment where multiple individuals were present in the camera's field of view. Gait data from 20 older adults (mean age 70.06±9.45 years) performing Single-Task and Dual-Task walking trials were synchronously captured using custom hardware for precise temporal alignment. Eleven gait markers spanning macro, micro-temporal, micro-spatial, and spatiotemporal domains were compared using mean absolute error (MAE), Pearson correlation (<i>r</i>), and Bland-Altman analysis. Foot-mounted IMUs demonstrated the highest accuracy (MAE =0.00-6.12, r=0.92-1.00), followed closely by the Azure Kinect (MAE =0.01-6.07, r=0.68-0.98). Lumbar-mounted IMUs showed consistently lower agreement with the reference system. These findings provide the first comprehensive comparison of wearable and depth-sensing technologies with a clinical gold standard under real-world conditions and across an extensive set of gait markers. The results establish a foundation for deploying scalable, low-cost gait assessment systems in diverse healthcare contexts, supporting early detection, mobility monitoring, and rehabilitation outcomes across multiple patient populations.

SensorsVol. 25(17)
University of Miami Health System (US), Florida Atlantic University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Gait Recognition and Analysis
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.