GOVERNANCE AND STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO GLOBAL RANKINGS: EVIDENCE FROM UZBEK UNIVERSITIES

International university rankings have become strong tools of governance that impact strategic institutional policies and higher education reforms on the global front. In the case of emerging systems like Uzbekistan, rankings are a challenge as well as a chance to be recognized in the world. This paper presents the response of universities in Uzbekistan to the ranking pressures based on interviews with administrators of a public, private, and international branch campus university, and review of national policy documents. The results leave a very clear picture of contrasts between the private and international universities: international branding, autonomy in decision-making, and research incentives are indicators of structured approaches to ranking whereas bureaucratic rigidity, lack of autonomy, and inadequate allocation of resources characterize universities in public. The more important determinant of competitiveness turns out to be governance capacity, not ambition. The paper concludes that to achieve sustainable progress in rankings, reforms to governance are needed that increase autonomy, accountability, and institutional capacity and integrate rankings into larger education, research, and development missions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ilgʻor iqtisodiyot va pedagogik texnologiyalar.
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60078/3060-4842-2025-vol2-iss4-pp499-506
Primary Topic
Gender, Education, and Development Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GOVERNANCE AND STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO GLOBAL RANKINGS: EVIDENCE FROM UZBEK UNIVERSITIES

Muxlisa Xamidova
Ilgʻor iqtisodiyot va pedagogik texnologiyalar.
Gender, Education, and Development Issues
article

GOVERNANCE AND STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO GLOBAL RANKINGS: EVIDENCE FROM UZBEK UNIVERSITIES

Muxlisa Xamidova
article en

Abstract

International university rankings have become strong tools of governance that impact strategic institutional policies and higher education reforms on the global front. In the case of emerging systems like Uzbekistan, rankings are a challenge as well as a chance to be recognized in the world. This paper presents the response of universities in Uzbekistan to the ranking pressures based on interviews with administrators of a public, private, and international branch campus university, and review of national policy documents. The results leave a very clear picture of contrasts between the private and international universities: international branding, autonomy in decision-making, and research incentives are indicators of structured approaches to ranking whereas bureaucratic rigidity, lack of autonomy, and inadequate allocation of resources characterize universities in public. The more important determinant of competitiveness turns out to be governance capacity, not ambition. The paper concludes that to achieve sustainable progress in rankings, reforms to governance are needed that increase autonomy, accountability, and institutional capacity and integrate rankings into larger education, research, and development missions.

Ilgʻor iqtisodiyot va pedagogik texnologiyalar.Vol. 2(4)
Westminster International University in Tashkent (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Gender, Education, and Development Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.