Comparison of Newton, Einstein and Brans–Dicke Gravitational Effects Associated with Earth and Other Planets Shape Determination

A comparison between classical, relativistic and Brans–Dicke gravitational effects related to planetary shape characterization is presented. The periastron shifts for orbits around the Earth and the giant planets which can be used as tools for determinations of their shape and density distribution, are the main object of our analysis. The conditions on the parameters improving the possibility to resolve mixed effects are studied. Differing from the approach in a previous work, we now include the observational errors for the classical expansion parameters $$J_{n}$$ —which are of particular relevance for the ice giants Uranus and Neptune—as well as the corrections to gravitomagnetic effects resulting from a slight inclination of the satellite orbits. Also, some non-orbital considerations are carried out for the coefficient $$J_{3}$$ associated to the South-North asymmetry of the mass distribution of the other two giant planets and the Earth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gravitation and Cosmology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s0202289325700252
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Newton, Einstein and Brans–Dicke Gravitational Effects Associated with Earth and Other Planets Shape Determination

C. Simeone, Sabrina Y. Fazzito
Gravitation and Cosmology
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
article

Comparison of Newton, Einstein and Brans–Dicke Gravitational Effects Associated with Earth and Other Planets Shape Determination

C. Simeone, Sabrina Y. Fazzito
article en

Abstract

A comparison between classical, relativistic and Brans–Dicke gravitational effects related to planetary shape characterization is presented. The periastron shifts for orbits around the Earth and the giant planets which can be used as tools for determinations of their shape and density distribution, are the main object of our analysis. The conditions on the parameters improving the possibility to resolve mixed effects are studied. Differing from the approach in a previous work, we now include the observational errors for the classical expansion parameters $$J_{n}$$ —which are of particular relevance for the ice giants Uranus and Neptune—as well as the corrections to gravitomagnetic effects resulting from a slight inclination of the satellite orbits. Also, some non-orbital considerations are carried out for the coefficient $$J_{3}$$ associated to the South-North asymmetry of the mass distribution of the other two giant planets and the Earth.

Gravitation and CosmologyVol. 31(3)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.