SARS-CoV-2 Infection or COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination Elicits Partially Different Spike-Reactive Memory B Cell Responses in Naïve Individuals

<b>Background:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic provided a unique opportunity to evaluate how the human immune system responded to a novel pathogen and to determine whether immune responses initiated through natural infection differ from those elicited by vaccination against the same antigen. Here, we provide a comprehensive analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S-antigen)-reactive memory B cells (B_mem) elicited in previously immunologically naïve subjects following their first infection with the original Wuhan-Hu-1 (WH1)-like strain or their initial COVID-19 mRNA prime-boost regimen encoding the same WH1-S-antigen. In particular, we tested the hypothesis that the primary encounter of SARS-CoV-2 S-antigen in lung mucosal tissues during infection vs. intramuscular COVID-19 mRNA injection would elicit different B_mem responses. <b>Methods:</b> Cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples collected following primary infection with the WH1 strain or completion of the initial prime-boost vaccination regimen were tested in ImmunoSpot^® assays to assess the frequency, Ig class/subclass usage, and cross-reactivity of the S-antigen-reactive B_mem compartment; pre-pandemic blood draws served as naïve controls. <b>Results</b>: The B_mem repertoires generated post-infection vs. post-vaccination were found to be quite similar but with some subtle differences. In both cases, the prevalent induction of IgG1-expressing B_mem in similar frequencies was seen, ~30% of which targeted the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the WH1-S-antigen. Also, the extent of cross-reactivity with the future Omicron (BA.1) RBD was found to be similar for both cohorts. However, IgA⁺ B_mem were preferentially induced after infection, while IgG4⁺ B_mem were detected only after vaccination. <b>Conclusions:</b> B_mem elicited in naïve human subjects following SARS-CoV-2 infection or after WH1-S encoding mRNA vaccination were only subtly different, although the relevance of these differences as it relates to immune protection warrants further investigation. Our findings serve to illustrate the usefulness and feasibility of performing comprehensive monitoring of antigen-specific B cell memory in larger cohorts using the ImmunoSpot^® technique.