Benefits of a Landfast Ice Representation on Simulated Antarctic Sea Ice and Coastal Polynya Dynamics

Abstract The Antarctic coastal marine region is a unique and highly complex environment, of which landfast ice and polynyas are key features, especially in the context of dense water formation. Current large‐scale ocean‐sea ice models used in climate studies simulate hardly any Antarctic landfast ice, which has presumably negative implications on sea ice and polynya dynamics. Here we develop, implement, and evaluate an empirical circumpolar Antarctic landfast‐ice representation for large‐scale ocean‐sea ice models. This representation is based on the restoring of sea ice velocity to zero where and when landfast ice is observed, according to a recently released circum‐Antarctic landfast ice database. Using 2001–2017 hindcast simulations with the NEMO‐ model, we demonstrate that prescribing landfast ice not only ensures accurate landfast ice coverage, as expected, but also largely improves the simulated landfast ice thickness and polynya dynamics. This includes more realistic polynya coverage, individual polynya shape, frequency, and ice production rates. Additionally, the model low bias in summer ice extent is reduced, as prescribing landfast ice locks thicker ice near the coast, taking longer to melt. Our simulations also give the first estimate of landfast ice volume, representing 10.6% of the pan‐Antarctic total, compared to 3.8% of the total Antarctic sea ice extent. We argue that velocity restoring is appropriate for some investigations of the Antarctic landfast ice over the recent past, but not for the remote past or future projections, for which a physical representation of landfast ice drivers, particularly iceberg‐sea ice interactions, is necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jc022032
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benefits of a Landfast Ice Representation on Simulated Antarctic Sea Ice and Coastal Polynya Dynamics

Antoine Barthélemy, Martin Vancoppenolle, Christoph Kittel, Pierre-Yves Barriat et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
article

Benefits of a Landfast Ice Representation on Simulated Antarctic Sea Ice and Coastal Polynya Dynamics

Antoine Barthélemy, Martin Vancoppenolle, Christoph Kittel, Pierre-Yves Barriat, Gurvan Madec, Noé Pirlet, Alexander D. Fraser, Pierre Mathiot, Charles Pelletier, Clément Rousset, T. Fichefet
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Antarctic coastal marine region is a unique and highly complex environment, of which landfast ice and polynyas are key features, especially in the context of dense water formation. Current large‐scale ocean‐sea ice models used in climate studies simulate hardly any Antarctic landfast ice, which has presumably negative implications on sea ice and polynya dynamics. Here we develop, implement, and evaluate an empirical circumpolar Antarctic landfast‐ice representation for large‐scale ocean‐sea ice models. This representation is based on the restoring of sea ice velocity to zero where and when landfast ice is observed, according to a recently released circum‐Antarctic landfast ice database. Using 2001–2017 hindcast simulations with the NEMO‐ model, we demonstrate that prescribing landfast ice not only ensures accurate landfast ice coverage, as expected, but also largely improves the simulated landfast ice thickness and polynya dynamics. This includes more realistic polynya coverage, individual polynya shape, frequency, and ice production rates. Additionally, the model low bias in summer ice extent is reduced, as prescribing landfast ice locks thicker ice near the coast, taking longer to melt. Our simulations also give the first estimate of landfast ice volume, representing 10.6% of the pan‐Antarctic total, compared to 3.8% of the total Antarctic sea ice extent. We argue that velocity restoring is appropriate for some investigations of the Antarctic landfast ice over the recent past, but not for the remote past or future projections, for which a physical representation of landfast ice drivers, particularly iceberg‐sea ice interactions, is necessary.

Journal of Geophysical Research OceansVol. 130(9)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Tasmania (AU), Australian Antarctic Division (AU), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Liège (BE), Sorbonne Université (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut des Géosciences de l'Environnement (FR), Laboratoire d'Océanographie et du Climat : Expérimentations et Approches Numériques (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR), UCLouvain (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.