The Ethics of College Students as Research Participants: an Analysis of Guidelines in University IRB Websites in the United States

Abstract Existing research on students participating in human subjects research (HSR) has focused on the implications of these samples for the generalizability and validity of the data and conclusions. In this article, we focus on the ethical dimensions of students as research subjects by analyzing IRB websites framing this issue at 100 universities in the United States. We find differences in the frequency of engagement with this topic across PhD-granting research universities compared to undergraduate-focused institutions, but common themes. We conducted a content analysis to examine how websites discussed consent, confidentiality, and the relationship between research participation and learning. We find that IRB websites across institutional types mention concerns about vulnerability—especially related to consent and coercion when instructors recruit their own students—as well as concerns related to confidentiality. Further, many IRB websites underscore the educational benefit of research participation. Understanding how institutional websites discuss students’ involvement in research sheds light on the regulatory and educational role of IRBs, as well as the ethical considerations faculty and others should weigh when conducting human subjects research with students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Academic Ethics
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09670-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Service-Learning and Community Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ethics of College Students as Research Participants: an Analysis of Guidelines in University IRB Websites in the United States

Shiri Noy, Nausica Marcos Miguel, Lorraine Burke
1 citations
Journal of Academic Ethics
Service-Learning and Community Engagement
8.93
article

The Ethics of College Students as Research Participants: an Analysis of Guidelines in University IRB Websites in the United States

Shiri Noy, Nausica Marcos Miguel, Lorraine Burke
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Existing research on students participating in human subjects research (HSR) has focused on the implications of these samples for the generalizability and validity of the data and conclusions. In this article, we focus on the ethical dimensions of students as research subjects by analyzing IRB websites framing this issue at 100 universities in the United States. We find differences in the frequency of engagement with this topic across PhD-granting research universities compared to undergraduate-focused institutions, but common themes. We conducted a content analysis to examine how websites discussed consent, confidentiality, and the relationship between research participation and learning. We find that IRB websites across institutional types mention concerns about vulnerability—especially related to consent and coercion when instructors recruit their own students—as well as concerns related to confidentiality. Further, many IRB websites underscore the educational benefit of research participation. Understanding how institutional websites discuss students’ involvement in research sheds light on the regulatory and educational role of IRBs, as well as the ethical considerations faculty and others should weigh when conducting human subjects research with students.

Journal of Academic EthicsVol. 23(4)
HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts (BE), Denison University (US), Ghent University (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Service-Learning and Community Engagement
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.