Managing overaccumulation: China’s new affordable rental housing programme and its financialization through REITs

Social housing has been experiencing a global trend towards residualization, primarily targeting vulnerable groups through non-market methods. Meanwhile, it is undergoing a parallel trend of financialization, where it is increasingly treated as a financial asset for trading and speculation. In contrast, social rented housing in China is transitioning to a mass model and embracing financialization, exemplified by the government’s proactive promotion of the Affordable Rental Housing (ARH) programme and the introduction of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) for social housing investment. However, the combination of seemingly non-profit social housing with profit-driven REITs remains an understudied phenomenon. This paper addresses this gap by drawing on theories of overaccumulation and state entrepreneurialism. We explore the rationales driving the promotion of ARH and ARH-REITs and investigate the state’s role in facilitating this process. We argue that China’s development and financialization of ARH is increasingly adopted as a national strategy to mitigate the overaccumulation crisis in the homeownership sector through a ‘spatial fix’ wherein capital circulates within the secondary circuit rather than switches between circuits of capital. This strategy involves establishing legal frameworks and institutions to make ARH profitable, stimulating demand by expanding target groups to include middle- to high-income ‘talents’ with additional benefits, stimulating supply by reducing costs and political directives, and promoting financial innovation and credit enhancement. We conclude with concerns about the potential long-term ‘crisis-magnifying’ effects of this spatial fix and its implications for vulnerable households.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning A Economy and Space
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x251360878
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing overaccumulation: China’s new affordable rental housing programme and its financialization through REITs

Jie Chen, Sebastian Kohl, Manuel B. Aalbers, Bo Li
4 citations
Environment and Planning A Economy and Space
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
8.83
article

Managing overaccumulation: China’s new affordable rental housing programme and its financialization through REITs

Jie Chen, Sebastian Kohl, Manuel B. Aalbers, Bo Li
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Social housing has been experiencing a global trend towards residualization, primarily targeting vulnerable groups through non-market methods. Meanwhile, it is undergoing a parallel trend of financialization, where it is increasingly treated as a financial asset for trading and speculation. In contrast, social rented housing in China is transitioning to a mass model and embracing financialization, exemplified by the government’s proactive promotion of the Affordable Rental Housing (ARH) programme and the introduction of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) for social housing investment. However, the combination of seemingly non-profit social housing with profit-driven REITs remains an understudied phenomenon. This paper addresses this gap by drawing on theories of overaccumulation and state entrepreneurialism. We explore the rationales driving the promotion of ARH and ARH-REITs and investigate the state’s role in facilitating this process. We argue that China’s development and financialization of ARH is increasingly adopted as a national strategy to mitigate the overaccumulation crisis in the homeownership sector through a ‘spatial fix’ wherein capital circulates within the secondary circuit rather than switches between circuits of capital. This strategy involves establishing legal frameworks and institutions to make ARH profitable, stimulating demand by expanding target groups to include middle- to high-income ‘talents’ with additional benefits, stimulating supply by reducing costs and political directives, and promoting financial innovation and credit enhancement. We conclude with concerns about the potential long-term ‘crisis-magnifying’ effects of this spatial fix and its implications for vulnerable households.

Environment and Planning A Economy and SpaceVol. 57(8)
John F. Kennedy University (US), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), KU Leuven (BE)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
8.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.