Exploring foundation students' AI math tool preferences, duration of use, and confidence in mathematics problem-solving

Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly integrated into mathematics education due to features such as step-by-step solutions and interactive feedback. As students often face challenges in mastering mathematical concepts, this study explores the preferred AI math tools among foundation students at the University of Technology Sarawak (UTS), assessing their potential as self-study aids for both independent learning and classroom use. It also investigates how long students have been using these tools and whether their confidence in solving mathematical problems correlates with the duration of use. A total of 340 students from the Foundation in Arts (FIA) and Foundation in Science (FIS) programmes participated in a quantitative, cross-sectional survey. Descriptive statistics were used to examine tool preferences and usage patterns, while Spearman’s rank correlation was applied to explore the relationship between confidence levels and AI tool usage duration. Findings indicate that ChatGPT is the preferred tool, followed by Photomath and CameraMath. Most students identified as relatively new users, with the majority having used AI tools for less than six months. While confidence in problem-solving showed a modest increase with longer usage, the correlation was weak and statistically insignificant. These results suggest that although AI tools are widely adopted, their impact on student confidence remains limited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/16869
Primary Topic
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring foundation students' AI math tool preferences, duration of use, and confidence in mathematics problem-solving

Tiew Mee Chien, Tang Howe Eng, Chui Ting Grace Lau
Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
article

Exploring foundation students' AI math tool preferences, duration of use, and confidence in mathematics problem-solving

Tiew Mee Chien, Tang Howe Eng, Chui Ting Grace Lau
article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly integrated into mathematics education due to features such as step-by-step solutions and interactive feedback. As students often face challenges in mastering mathematical concepts, this study explores the preferred AI math tools among foundation students at the University of Technology Sarawak (UTS), assessing their potential as self-study aids for both independent learning and classroom use. It also investigates how long students have been using these tools and whether their confidence in solving mathematical problems correlates with the duration of use. A total of 340 students from the Foundation in Arts (FIA) and Foundation in Science (FIS) programmes participated in a quantitative, cross-sectional survey. Descriptive statistics were used to examine tool preferences and usage patterns, while Spearman’s rank correlation was applied to explore the relationship between confidence levels and AI tool usage duration. Findings indicate that ChatGPT is the preferred tool, followed by Photomath and CameraMath. Most students identified as relatively new users, with the majority having used AI tools for less than six months. While confidence in problem-solving showed a modest increase with longer usage, the correlation was weak and statistically insignificant. These results suggest that although AI tools are widely adopted, their impact on student confidence remains limited.

Journal of Mathematics and Science TeacherVol. 5(4)
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (MY), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.