The intertemporal unfairness of the feed-in tariff scheme in the United Kingdom: Catching up across regions

The Feed-in Tariff (FIT) scheme in the UK was designed to promote residential solar photovoltaic (PV) projects by offering fixed payments for electricity generated, thereby positioning solar PV as an investment opportunity for households. This study investigates the role of income in shaping the uptake of solar PV under the FIT scheme and assesses the intertemporal fairness of the financial returns it provides. Using data from 323 local authority districts, the analysis focuses on two major installation peaks in 2011 and 2015, which correspond to significant changes in tariff rates. The findings reveal a positive relationship between income and solar PV adoption during the first peak, but a negative relationship in the second. This shift suggests that as installation costs declined, lower-income regions began to catch up in adopting solar PV. However, by estimating the expected (ex ante) rates of return across these periods, the study identifies a substantial decline in returns, both between the two peaks and following sharp reductions in tariff rates. These results indicate that early adopters in higher-income regions achieved significantly higher financial returns than those who adopted later. The study reveals a form of intertemporal unfairness embedded in the FIT scheme, confirming the need for more frequent and responsive tariff adjustments to ensure consistent investment incentives over time. • Disposable income correlated differently with solar PV uptake in 2011 and 2015. • Higher-income regions adopted earlier while lower-income regions caught up later. • Early adopters gained higher financial returns than late adopters. • Declining tariffs led to intertemporal unfairness in investment returns. • More frequent tariff revisions needed to ensure fairer incentives on investment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Utilities Policy
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2025.102044
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The intertemporal unfairness of the feed-in tariff scheme in the United Kingdom: Catching up across regions

Bill Lee, Jinke Li, Jing Shao
Utilities Policy
Global trade and economics
article

The intertemporal unfairness of the feed-in tariff scheme in the United Kingdom: Catching up across regions

Bill Lee, Jinke Li, Jing Shao
article en

Abstract

The Feed-in Tariff (FIT) scheme in the UK was designed to promote residential solar photovoltaic (PV) projects by offering fixed payments for electricity generated, thereby positioning solar PV as an investment opportunity for households. This study investigates the role of income in shaping the uptake of solar PV under the FIT scheme and assesses the intertemporal fairness of the financial returns it provides. Using data from 323 local authority districts, the analysis focuses on two major installation peaks in 2011 and 2015, which correspond to significant changes in tariff rates. The findings reveal a positive relationship between income and solar PV adoption during the first peak, but a negative relationship in the second. This shift suggests that as installation costs declined, lower-income regions began to catch up in adopting solar PV. However, by estimating the expected (ex ante) rates of return across these periods, the study identifies a substantial decline in returns, both between the two peaks and following sharp reductions in tariff rates. These results indicate that early adopters in higher-income regions achieved significantly higher financial returns than those who adopted later. The study reveals a form of intertemporal unfairness embedded in the FIT scheme, confirming the need for more frequent and responsive tariff adjustments to ensure consistent investment incentives over time. • Disposable income correlated differently with solar PV uptake in 2011 and 2015. • Higher-income regions adopted earlier while lower-income regions caught up later. • Early adopters gained higher financial returns than late adopters. • Declining tariffs led to intertemporal unfairness in investment returns. • More frequent tariff revisions needed to ensure fairer incentives on investment.

Utilities PolicyVol. 97
Swansea University (GB), University of Wales Trinity Saint David (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The intertemporal unfairness of the feed-in tariff scheme in the United Kingdom: Catching up across regions — Bill Lee, Jinke Li, et al. · Utilities Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS