Who Likes Americans and Who Doesn’t: Assessing Effects of Fundamentalism, Liberal Values, and Prosociality on Tunisian Attitudes

Abstract A survey experiment assessed effects of religious fundamentalism, liberal values, and prosocial behavior on Tunisian’s evaluations of fellow Tunisians and Americans. Participants high in religious fundamentalism and low in liberal values evaluated Tunisian targets more positively than American targets. The finding on liberal values was best accounted for by an explanation based in ethnocentrism, and the finding on fundamentalism by a social identity explanation. Additionally, irrespective of target nationality, participants upgraded targets they viewed as prosocial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12399-025-01062-5
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Likes Americans and Who Doesn’t: Assessing Effects of Fundamentalism, Liberal Values, and Prosociality on Tunisian Attitudes

Mansoor Moaddel, Kelly Beavan, Jeffrey W. Lucas
Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Who Likes Americans and Who Doesn’t: Assessing Effects of Fundamentalism, Liberal Values, and Prosociality on Tunisian Attitudes

Mansoor Moaddel, Kelly Beavan, Jeffrey W. Lucas
article en

Abstract

Abstract A survey experiment assessed effects of religious fundamentalism, liberal values, and prosocial behavior on Tunisian’s evaluations of fellow Tunisians and Americans. Participants high in religious fundamentalism and low in liberal values evaluated Tunisian targets more positively than American targets. The finding on liberal values was best accounted for by an explanation based in ethnocentrism, and the finding on fundamentalism by a social identity explanation. Additionally, irrespective of target nationality, participants upgraded targets they viewed as prosocial.

Zeitschrift für Außen- und SicherheitspolitikVol. 18(3)
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.