К ВОПРОСУ О ПРИРОДЕ ШТРАФОВ И МЕР ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТИ В ЗЕМЛЯХ ДРЕВНЕЙ РУСИ В X–XV ВВ.

The article is devoted to determining the significance of the system of fines (blood and sales) in the Old Russian state of the X–XV centuries. It turns out that the system of fines mentioned in the Russian Pravda did not refer to measures of responsibility for offenses against person and property, but was a kind of payment for justice, a revenue article of princely justice, which monopolized the arbitration of interpersonal and interclan conflicts. In this context, the abolition of blood vengeance and the transfer of the dispute to princely arbitration is proposed to be seen as a transformation of various traditions related to conflict resolution that existed among the Slavs and Russians even before the vocation of Rurik and the Christianization of the East Slavic population. It is also emphasized that princes abolished blood revenge not because it totally threatened society, but because the settlement of conflict with a view to preventing blood revenge as the extreme of its development was practically entirely relegated to princely jurisdiction; the measures of liability were not vires and sales, but compensation for the damage caused, which the victim and members of his family-clan group received as a result of the hearing of the case by a court of princely or manorial justice. The article also examines other forms of responsibility reflected in the sources of law of the period under study. According to the author, they were not a prototype of modern punishment, but were due to the tradition of neutralizing the person who tried to calm the ancient collective, by means of his isolation. Such forms included: flow and plunder, expulsion, imprisonment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Vestnik Samarskogo iuridicheskogo instituta
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37523/sui.2025.63.2.013
Primary Topic
Historical and Archaeological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

К ВОПРОСУ О ПРИРОДЕ ШТРАФОВ И МЕР ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТИ В ЗЕМЛЯХ ДРЕВНЕЙ РУСИ В X–XV ВВ.

П.С. Солоницын
Vestnik Samarskogo iuridicheskogo instituta
Historical and Archaeological Studies
article

К ВОПРОСУ О ПРИРОДЕ ШТРАФОВ И МЕР ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТИ В ЗЕМЛЯХ ДРЕВНЕЙ РУСИ В X–XV ВВ.

П.С. Солоницын
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to determining the significance of the system of fines (blood and sales) in the Old Russian state of the X–XV centuries. It turns out that the system of fines mentioned in the Russian Pravda did not refer to measures of responsibility for offenses against person and property, but was a kind of payment for justice, a revenue article of princely justice, which monopolized the arbitration of interpersonal and interclan conflicts. In this context, the abolition of blood vengeance and the transfer of the dispute to princely arbitration is proposed to be seen as a transformation of various traditions related to conflict resolution that existed among the Slavs and Russians even before the vocation of Rurik and the Christianization of the East Slavic population. It is also emphasized that princes abolished blood revenge not because it totally threatened society, but because the settlement of conflict with a view to preventing blood revenge as the extreme of its development was practically entirely relegated to princely jurisdiction; the measures of liability were not vires and sales, but compensation for the damage caused, which the victim and members of his family-clan group received as a result of the hearing of the case by a court of princely or manorial justice. The article also examines other forms of responsibility reflected in the sources of law of the period under study. According to the author, they were not a prototype of modern punishment, but were due to the tradition of neutralizing the person who tried to calm the ancient collective, by means of his isolation. Such forms included: flow and plunder, expulsion, imprisonment.

Vestnik Samarskogo iuridicheskogo instituta(2(63))
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Historical and Archaeological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.