Prehabilitation service delivery for patients with head and neck cancer: a cross-sectional study into UK healthcare professionals’ views

Background Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the eighth most common cancer in the UK and is associated with significant morbidity. There is a paucity of evidence regarding prehabilitation for people with HNC and more research is needed to ensure patients are well prepared for treatment and its aftermath. Aim To explore UK healthcare professionals’ views on HNC prehabilitation service delivery. Method A prospective and descriptive cross-sectional study design was used. A total of 118 healthcare professionals working with patients with HCN in the UK completed an online survey. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and free-text comments were analysed using qualitative inductive content analysis. Findings Almost all respondents considered that prehabilitation benefits patients with HNC and a large majority favoured service delivery within a clinic led by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). However, over half of respondents said they would not have capacity to provide prehabilitation in the next 12 months. Over half of respondents expressed a need for training on prehabilitation and the implementation and evaluation of a prehabilitation service. Further prerequisites for setting up an HNC prehabilitation service included sustained funding and robust governance structures. Conclusion The study adds to the limited evidence base on prehabilitation service delivery for patients with HNC. Its findings regarding the prerequisites for implementing HNC prehabilitation could be used to guide the planning of new services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Nursing Practice
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7748/cnp.2025.e1891
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prehabilitation service delivery for patients with head and neck cancer: a cross-sectional study into UK healthcare professionals’ views

Julie Armoogum, Deanne Curtin
Cancer Nursing Practice
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Prehabilitation service delivery for patients with head and neck cancer: a cross-sectional study into UK healthcare professionals’ views

Julie Armoogum, Deanne Curtin
article en

Abstract

Background Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the eighth most common cancer in the UK and is associated with significant morbidity. There is a paucity of evidence regarding prehabilitation for people with HNC and more research is needed to ensure patients are well prepared for treatment and its aftermath. Aim To explore UK healthcare professionals’ views on HNC prehabilitation service delivery. Method A prospective and descriptive cross-sectional study design was used. A total of 118 healthcare professionals working with patients with HCN in the UK completed an online survey. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and free-text comments were analysed using qualitative inductive content analysis. Findings Almost all respondents considered that prehabilitation benefits patients with HNC and a large majority favoured service delivery within a clinic led by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). However, over half of respondents said they would not have capacity to provide prehabilitation in the next 12 months. Over half of respondents expressed a need for training on prehabilitation and the implementation and evaluation of a prehabilitation service. Further prerequisites for setting up an HNC prehabilitation service included sustained funding and robust governance structures. Conclusion The study adds to the limited evidence base on prehabilitation service delivery for patients with HNC. Its findings regarding the prerequisites for implementing HNC prehabilitation could be used to guide the planning of new services.

Cancer Nursing Practice
University of Ulster (GB), University of the West of England (GB), Altnagelvin Area Hospital (GB), Western Health and Social Care Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prehabilitation service delivery for patients with head and neck cancer: a cross-sectional study into UK healthcare professionals’ views — Julie Armoogum, Deanne Curtin · Cancer Nursing Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS