Experimental Study on Seismic Performance of Steel-Reinforced Concrete Columns Under Different Loading Protocols

Traditional pseudo-static loading tests fail to capture the unique characteristics of special ground motions, limiting their ability to accurately evaluate the seismic performance of steel-reinforced concrete (SRC) columns. In this study, eight SRC columns were subjected to pseudo-static tests using far-field, near-field, and traditional loading protocols to investigate their structural response under different seismic scenarios. The results show that far-field loading, characterized by repeated large displacement cycles, leads to increased damage accumulation, reduced hysteresis curve fullness, greater bearing capacity loss, significant stiffness degradation, and diminished ductility and energy dissipation. In contrast, near-field loading—dominated by an initial extreme displacement—results in fewer but less developed cracks and a larger concrete crushed zone at failure. The severe initial damage under near-field loading causes a noticeable decline in stiffness and strength during subsequent cycles. During the second loading stage, both the peak load and post-peak deformation capacity are further reduced, significantly impairing the columns’ ability to resist additional seismic demands. These findings highlight the critical role of loading history in shaping the seismic behavior of SRC composite columns.