Self-criticism, experiential avoidance, social anxiety and depression in an experience sampling paradigm

Abstract Social anxiety and depression are frequently comorbid and share common etiological factors, like self-criticism and experiential avoidance. In the present study, we used an experience-sampling methodology (ESM) to test a schema therapy model of state social anxiety and depression, conceptualized as schema modes. In a sample of 145 individuals, we tested the predictive role of self-criticism and experiential avoidance on social anxiety and depression in a three levels multi-level framework: on the next beep (level 1, lagged effect), daily average (level 2), and participant overall average (level 3). In a second analysis, we modeled the data as a residual dynamic structural equation modeling (RDSEM) cross-lagged panel model. Results in the three levels analyses were in line with our hypotheses on the daily timeframe and at between-subjects level (levels 2 and 3). In the cross-lagged analysis, depression was a consistent predictor of all other variables on next beep, while experiential avoidance predicted next beep reports on social anxiety. Self-criticism and experiential avoidance were also mediators in the relationships between early maladaptive schemas and the average reports of state social anxiety and depression on the between-subjects level of the RDSEM analysis. Future directions, limitations and implications are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Psychology
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08264-2
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-criticism, experiential avoidance, social anxiety and depression in an experience sampling paradigm

Diana Nechita, Paula Stroian, Liviu A. Fodor, Simona Ștefan et al.
Current Psychology
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

Self-criticism, experiential avoidance, social anxiety and depression in an experience sampling paradigm

Diana Nechita, Paula Stroian, Liviu A. Fodor, Simona Ștefan, Matu Silviu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Social anxiety and depression are frequently comorbid and share common etiological factors, like self-criticism and experiential avoidance. In the present study, we used an experience-sampling methodology (ESM) to test a schema therapy model of state social anxiety and depression, conceptualized as schema modes. In a sample of 145 individuals, we tested the predictive role of self-criticism and experiential avoidance on social anxiety and depression in a three levels multi-level framework: on the next beep (level 1, lagged effect), daily average (level 2), and participant overall average (level 3). In a second analysis, we modeled the data as a residual dynamic structural equation modeling (RDSEM) cross-lagged panel model. Results in the three levels analyses were in line with our hypotheses on the daily timeframe and at between-subjects level (levels 2 and 3). In the cross-lagged analysis, depression was a consistent predictor of all other variables on next beep, while experiential avoidance predicted next beep reports on social anxiety. Self-criticism and experiential avoidance were also mediators in the relationships between early maladaptive schemas and the average reports of state social anxiety and depression on the between-subjects level of the RDSEM analysis. Future directions, limitations and implications are discussed.

Current PsychologyVol. 44(21)
Babeș-Bolyai University (RO), International Institute for Advanced Studies (JP)
Ministerul Cercetării, Inovării şi Digitalizării, Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.