Contextual Frameworks for Agentic AI: Engineering Adaptive Memory and Retrieval Mechanisms

In fast-paced, strongly regulated settings, traditional AI agents face systemic difficulties because of their rigid memory structures and limited retrieval methods. Because of how traditional models work, the system won't be able to adapt and iterate as quickly as it needs to, especially in a fast-paced environment. It's even harder to reconcile changes that come from a name appearing in external documents with changes that need to be made to regulatory obligations as laws and regulations change and modernize. When the context changes, agents that use conventional models have a harder time adapting and breaking things down. This leads to poorer throughput, less responsiveness, less contextual awareness, and a higher chance of noncompliance. To address the aforementioned issues, a system has been developed that integrates dynamic memory components with carefully researched enhancements to retrieval methodologies. This basically lets the agent better understand a wider picture while also helping it recall previous and future iterations in a more useful and effective way. Dynamic memory qualities enable agents to exhibit enhanced responsiveness, contextual awareness, and the capacity to make safe, regulatory-compliant judgments based on information; crucially, our system is designed to learn. Agent is a definition that doesn't have a time restriction. Agents become Agents by passing information down from learning to "forget." Because there are always ways to make memory better, agents can rely on it more, the memory space can be used by more people, and it can be more flexible in challenging compliance situations. A review of performance evaluations in compliance-themed data came to the same conclusion, revealing a significant improvement in retrieval performance accuracy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Fraud & Security
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52710/cfs.747
Primary Topic
Semantic Web and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contextual Frameworks for Agentic AI: Engineering Adaptive Memory and Retrieval Mechanisms

Naveen Kolli Narendra Kumar Reddy Choppa
Computer Fraud & Security
Semantic Web and Ontologies
article

Contextual Frameworks for Agentic AI: Engineering Adaptive Memory and Retrieval Mechanisms

Naveen Kolli Narendra Kumar Reddy Choppa
article en

Abstract

In fast-paced, strongly regulated settings, traditional AI agents face systemic difficulties because of their rigid memory structures and limited retrieval methods. Because of how traditional models work, the system won't be able to adapt and iterate as quickly as it needs to, especially in a fast-paced environment. It's even harder to reconcile changes that come from a name appearing in external documents with changes that need to be made to regulatory obligations as laws and regulations change and modernize. When the context changes, agents that use conventional models have a harder time adapting and breaking things down. This leads to poorer throughput, less responsiveness, less contextual awareness, and a higher chance of noncompliance. To address the aforementioned issues, a system has been developed that integrates dynamic memory components with carefully researched enhancements to retrieval methodologies. This basically lets the agent better understand a wider picture while also helping it recall previous and future iterations in a more useful and effective way. Dynamic memory qualities enable agents to exhibit enhanced responsiveness, contextual awareness, and the capacity to make safe, regulatory-compliant judgments based on information; crucially, our system is designed to learn. Agent is a definition that doesn't have a time restriction. Agents become Agents by passing information down from learning to "forget." Because there are always ways to make memory better, agents can rely on it more, the memory space can be used by more people, and it can be more flexible in challenging compliance situations. A review of performance evaluations in compliance-themed data came to the same conclusion, revealing a significant improvement in retrieval performance accuracy.

Computer Fraud & Security
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Semantic Web and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.