Towards a model for understanding failures in health data protection: a mixed-methods study

In digital health ecosystems, protecting health data is crucial for organisational survival, competitiveness, and effective care delivery. As healthcare organisations increasingly adopt digital health, failures in data protection pose significant risks. This mixed-method study identifies and explains key failure factors in health data protection. We conducted a literature review and a three-round Delphi study with data security practitioners and researchers, identifying and ranking 30 failure factors. The study led to the identification and ranking of 30 failure factors. Next, to develop a contextualised understanding of the failure factors, we conducted a qualitative study and applied the People-Process-Technology (PPT) framework to develop a research model. The top seven failure factors mapped to failures related to people (‘non-compliant behaviour’, and ‘lack of cybersecurity awareness’), process (‘inadequate risk management’, ‘inadequate data integrity monitoring and protection’, and ‘lack of data breach response and recovery plan’) and technology (‘unsecure third-party applications’, and ‘lack of data protection by design’). In the qualitative inquiry, we explained how these factors could lead to data breaches. Understanding the failure factors in health data protection helps healthcare organisations in successful data protection and devising mitigation policies to minimise the risk of data breaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behaviour and Information Technology
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2025.2551568
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a model for understanding failures in health data protection: a mixed-methods study

Javad Khazaei Pool, Farhad Fatehi, Farkhondeh Hassandoust, Andrew Burton‐Jones et al.
1 citations
Behaviour and Information Technology
Information and Cyber Security
3.25
article

Towards a model for understanding failures in health data protection: a mixed-methods study

Javad Khazaei Pool, Farhad Fatehi, Farkhondeh Hassandoust, Andrew Burton‐Jones, Saeed Akhlaghpour
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In digital health ecosystems, protecting health data is crucial for organisational survival, competitiveness, and effective care delivery. As healthcare organisations increasingly adopt digital health, failures in data protection pose significant risks. This mixed-method study identifies and explains key failure factors in health data protection. We conducted a literature review and a three-round Delphi study with data security practitioners and researchers, identifying and ranking 30 failure factors. The study led to the identification and ranking of 30 failure factors. Next, to develop a contextualised understanding of the failure factors, we conducted a qualitative study and applied the People-Process-Technology (PPT) framework to develop a research model. The top seven failure factors mapped to failures related to people (‘non-compliant behaviour’, and ‘lack of cybersecurity awareness’), process (‘inadequate risk management’, ‘inadequate data integrity monitoring and protection’, and ‘lack of data breach response and recovery plan’) and technology (‘unsecure third-party applications’, and ‘lack of data protection by design’). In the qualitative inquiry, we explained how these factors could lead to data breaches. Understanding the failure factors in health data protection helps healthcare organisations in successful data protection and devising mitigation policies to minimise the risk of data breaches.

Behaviour and Information Technology
University of Auckland (NZ), The University of Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Information and Cyber Security
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards a model for understanding failures in health data protection: a mixed-methods study — Javad Khazaei Pool, Farhad Fatehi, et al. · Behaviour and Information Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS