Unravelling the Major Cardiovascular Risks of Systemic Psoriasis Medications: A Literature Systematic Review

ABSTRACT Background Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory dermatological condition associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular events (CVEs). Systemic therapies have transformed disease management, but their cardiovascular (CV) safety profiles remain incompletely understood and inconsistently reported. Objectives To systematically evaluate and synthesize current evidence on the CV risks of systemic psoriasis treatments, with particular attention to treatment‐specific effects, study design quality and consistency of CV outcome reporting. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched four major databases for studies published from January 2013 to August 2024. Eligible studies included randomized‐controlled trials (RCTs), registry‐based RCTs (rRCTs), cohort studies, pharmacovigilance analyses and systematic reviews/meta‐analyses reporting CVEs in adults treated with systemic psoriasis therapies. We used Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools (ROB 2) and Risk Of Bias In Non‐randomized Studies ‐ of Interventions (ROBINS‐1) to assess the quality of included citations. Results From 14,744 records, 195 studies involving 1,795,823 patients were included. Methotrexate (MTX) and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) consistently demonstrated CV protective effects, with reductions in myocardial infarction, stroke and CV mortality supported by high‐quality evidence. Interleukin‐17 (IL‐17) inhibitors showed neutral to potentially beneficial CV profiles in both RCTs and observational studies. In contrast, cyclosporine, retinoids and fumaric acid esters were associated with elevated CV risks, particularly in retrospective cohorts. Evidence for IL‐12/23 and IL‐23 inhibitors was mixed—short‐term trials indicated safety, but some real‐world and pharmacovigilance data raised concerns. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that conclusions were robust when allocated to studies with a low risk of bias and prespecified CV endpoints. Conclusions CV safety varies substantially among systemic psoriasis therapies. MTX and TNFi agents appear most favourable for patients at elevated CV risk. IL‐17 inhibitors may also be safe alternatives. Further long‐term, high‐quality studies are needed to clarify the safety of newer biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JEADV Clinical Practice
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jvc2.70134
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unravelling the Major Cardiovascular Risks of Systemic Psoriasis Medications: A Literature Systematic Review

Thomas M. Franck, Bienvenu Bongué, Béatrice Trombert‐Paviot, Pauline Gouttefarde et al.
1 citations
JEADV Clinical Practice
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
0.80
article

Unravelling the Major Cardiovascular Risks of Systemic Psoriasis Medications: A Literature Systematic Review

Thomas M. Franck, Bienvenu Bongué, Béatrice Trombert‐Paviot, Pauline Gouttefarde, Jean Perrot, Mathieu Oriol, Yves Julien Mbama Biloa, Elisa Cinotti, F. Maccari, Mi Won Son, Gilles Cizeron
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory dermatological condition associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular events (CVEs). Systemic therapies have transformed disease management, but their cardiovascular (CV) safety profiles remain incompletely understood and inconsistently reported. Objectives To systematically evaluate and synthesize current evidence on the CV risks of systemic psoriasis treatments, with particular attention to treatment‐specific effects, study design quality and consistency of CV outcome reporting. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched four major databases for studies published from January 2013 to August 2024. Eligible studies included randomized‐controlled trials (RCTs), registry‐based RCTs (rRCTs), cohort studies, pharmacovigilance analyses and systematic reviews/meta‐analyses reporting CVEs in adults treated with systemic psoriasis therapies. We used Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools (ROB 2) and Risk Of Bias In Non‐randomized Studies ‐ of Interventions (ROBINS‐1) to assess the quality of included citations. Results From 14,744 records, 195 studies involving 1,795,823 patients were included. Methotrexate (MTX) and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) consistently demonstrated CV protective effects, with reductions in myocardial infarction, stroke and CV mortality supported by high‐quality evidence. Interleukin‐17 (IL‐17) inhibitors showed neutral to potentially beneficial CV profiles in both RCTs and observational studies. In contrast, cyclosporine, retinoids and fumaric acid esters were associated with elevated CV risks, particularly in retrospective cohorts. Evidence for IL‐12/23 and IL‐23 inhibitors was mixed—short‐term trials indicated safety, but some real‐world and pharmacovigilance data raised concerns. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that conclusions were robust when allocated to studies with a low risk of bias and prespecified CV endpoints. Conclusions CV safety varies substantially among systemic psoriasis therapies. MTX and TNFi agents appear most favourable for patients at elevated CV risk. IL‐17 inhibitors may also be safe alternatives. Further long‐term, high‐quality studies are needed to clarify the safety of newer biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors.

JEADV Clinical PracticeVol. 5(1)
University of Siena (IT), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Mines Saint-Étienne (FR), Laboratoire Hubert Curien (FR), Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes (FR), Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Bégin (FR), l'Assurance Maladie (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne (FR), Association pour l'Utilisation du Rein Artificiel (FR), Université Jean Monnet (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.