Unilateral Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: Approach and Clinical Outcomes

Objective: This study aims to analyze the clinical and functional outcomes of unilateral cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA), evaluating its efficacy, safety, and impact on patient recovery. Additionally, this research compares cementless TKA with the conventional cemented approach, highlighting advantages, disadvantages, and potential complications associated with each technique. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 280 patients who underwent unilateral cementless TKA. Demographic data, comorbidities, and biomechanical parameters were analyzed. Femoral and tibial movements were assessed through radiographic measurements, and functional outcomes were evaluated using clinical scores. Statistical analysis included the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality, the Kruskal-Wallis test for intergroup comparisons, and Dunn’s post-hoc test for pairwise differences. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Statistically significant differences were found in key biomechanical parameters, particularly in femoral slope (2.10° ± 1.35, p = 0.007), tibial flexion (4.40° ± 2.20, p = 0.009), and tibial extension (2.30° ± 1.60, p = 0.038). These results suggest that cementless TKA requires precise implant positioning to optimize sagittal alignment and postoperative function. Gender distribution showed a predominance of female patients (60.71%), and hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity (68.93%), reinforcing the need for perioperative cardiovascular risk management. No statistically significant differences were found in tibial varus, tibial valgus, or rotational movements. Conclusion: The findings support the efficacy and safety of cementless TKA, particularly in younger and active patients with good bone quality. Precise implant positioning is essential to minimize post-operative complications and ensure long-term survivorship. Compared to cemented TKA, cementless fixation presents advantages such as improved osseointegration and reduced cement-related complications but also requires careful patient selection to mitigate the risk of early implant loosening. Future studies should focus on long-term implant survival, functional recovery, and costeffectiveness to further refine the indications for cementless TKA.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Orthopaedics Research
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33140/ijor.08.02.01
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unilateral Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: Approach and Clinical Outcomes

Marcelo Horikawa, Pedro Henrique Barbieri Horikawa
International Journal of Orthopaedics Research
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Unilateral Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: Approach and Clinical Outcomes

Marcelo Horikawa, Pedro Henrique Barbieri Horikawa
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to analyze the clinical and functional outcomes of unilateral cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA), evaluating its efficacy, safety, and impact on patient recovery. Additionally, this research compares cementless TKA with the conventional cemented approach, highlighting advantages, disadvantages, and potential complications associated with each technique. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 280 patients who underwent unilateral cementless TKA. Demographic data, comorbidities, and biomechanical parameters were analyzed. Femoral and tibial movements were assessed through radiographic measurements, and functional outcomes were evaluated using clinical scores. Statistical analysis included the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality, the Kruskal-Wallis test for intergroup comparisons, and Dunn’s post-hoc test for pairwise differences. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Statistically significant differences were found in key biomechanical parameters, particularly in femoral slope (2.10° ± 1.35, p = 0.007), tibial flexion (4.40° ± 2.20, p = 0.009), and tibial extension (2.30° ± 1.60, p = 0.038). These results suggest that cementless TKA requires precise implant positioning to optimize sagittal alignment and postoperative function. Gender distribution showed a predominance of female patients (60.71%), and hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity (68.93%), reinforcing the need for perioperative cardiovascular risk management. No statistically significant differences were found in tibial varus, tibial valgus, or rotational movements. Conclusion: The findings support the efficacy and safety of cementless TKA, particularly in younger and active patients with good bone quality. Precise implant positioning is essential to minimize post-operative complications and ensure long-term survivorship. Compared to cemented TKA, cementless fixation presents advantages such as improved osseointegration and reduced cement-related complications but also requires careful patient selection to mitigate the risk of early implant loosening. Future studies should focus on long-term implant survival, functional recovery, and costeffectiveness to further refine the indications for cementless TKA.

International Journal of Orthopaedics ResearchVol. 8(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.