The would-be autocrats’ toolkit: what do incumbents do when they undermine democracy?

Abstract Since the 1990s, incumbent-led autocratization in democracies is increasingly common. However, there is surprisingly little systematic and comparative research into the actions would-be autocrats actually take when they undermine democracy. We analyse the wealth of in-depth case studies of all cases of incumbent-led autocratization in democracies from 1990 until 2023 to develop such an overview of autocratic actions inductively. This empirically based would-be autocrats’ toolkit encompasses over 400 unique autocratic actions which we classify into seven overarching modes of autocratization: evasion, manipulation, infiltration, duplication, restriction, prohibition, and delegitimation. Would-be autocrats selectively use these different modes in varying arenas of democracy to gradually erode democracy. The toolkit provides a starting point to more systematically study autocratization within and across different cases, enabling the identification of sequencing and diffusion patterns, and helping generate better understanding of when autocratization is successful.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Political Science Review
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773925100106
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The would-be autocrats’ toolkit: what do incumbents do when they undermine democracy?

Carolien van Ham, Joep van Lit
1 citations
European Political Science Review
Political Conflict and Governance
4.20
article

The would-be autocrats’ toolkit: what do incumbents do when they undermine democracy?

Carolien van Ham, Joep van Lit
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Since the 1990s, incumbent-led autocratization in democracies is increasingly common. However, there is surprisingly little systematic and comparative research into the actions would-be autocrats actually take when they undermine democracy. We analyse the wealth of in-depth case studies of all cases of incumbent-led autocratization in democracies from 1990 until 2023 to develop such an overview of autocratic actions inductively. This empirically based would-be autocrats’ toolkit encompasses over 400 unique autocratic actions which we classify into seven overarching modes of autocratization: evasion, manipulation, infiltration, duplication, restriction, prohibition, and delegitimation. Would-be autocrats selectively use these different modes in varying arenas of democracy to gradually erode democracy. The toolkit provides a starting point to more systematically study autocratization within and across different cases, enabling the identification of sequencing and diffusion patterns, and helping generate better understanding of when autocratization is successful.

European Political Science ReviewVol. 18(1)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Political Conflict and Governance
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The would-be autocrats’ toolkit: what do incumbents do when they undermine democracy? — Carolien van Ham, Joep van Lit · European Political Science Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS