Associating with Others. An Examination of Key Terms in Husserl’s Descriptions of Intersubjectivity

Husserl’s Fifth Cartesian Meditation has been analyzed more than most other texts by Husserl, usually with a critical eye toward how he describes his relation with another subject as similar to himself. Instead of reading this work through such a critical lens, or even through his phenomenology of intersubjectivity, though, I argue that important terms that Husserl employs here are ones that receive much attention in his analyses of passive synthesis. Terms such as “pairing” and “association,” in other words, have key positions in passive synthesis, and thus it is worthwhile to include Husserl’s analyses of passive synthesis—and related terms—in an interpretation of his descriptions of intersubjectivity. I thus begin with a textual analysis of Husserl’s use of association and pairing and how these are interconnected with the notions of affectivity and awakening. I then inquire into what, exactly, might be “awakened” when we experience an intersubjective encounter. While such considerations might not address all problematic issues with the Fifth CM, I hope that they can demonstrate that Husserl’s descriptions of intersubjectivity are deeper and more effective than is usually presumed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Phänomenologische Forschungen
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28937/9783787350339_7
Primary Topic
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associating with Others. An Examination of Key Terms in Husserl’s Descriptions of Intersubjectivity

Lanei M. Rodemeyer
Phänomenologische Forschungen
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
article

Associating with Others. An Examination of Key Terms in Husserl’s Descriptions of Intersubjectivity

Lanei M. Rodemeyer
article en

Abstract

Husserl’s Fifth Cartesian Meditation has been analyzed more than most other texts by Husserl, usually with a critical eye toward how he describes his relation with another subject as similar to himself. Instead of reading this work through such a critical lens, or even through his phenomenology of intersubjectivity, though, I argue that important terms that Husserl employs here are ones that receive much attention in his analyses of passive synthesis. Terms such as “pairing” and “association,” in other words, have key positions in passive synthesis, and thus it is worthwhile to include Husserl’s analyses of passive synthesis—and related terms—in an interpretation of his descriptions of intersubjectivity. I thus begin with a textual analysis of Husserl’s use of association and pairing and how these are interconnected with the notions of affectivity and awakening. I then inquire into what, exactly, might be “awakened” when we experience an intersubjective encounter. While such considerations might not address all problematic issues with the Fifth CM, I hope that they can demonstrate that Husserl’s descriptions of intersubjectivity are deeper and more effective than is usually presumed.

Phänomenologische ForschungenVol. 2025(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Associating with Others. An Examination of Key Terms in Husserl’s Descriptions of Intersubjectivity — Lanei M. Rodemeyer · Phänomenologische Forschungen (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS