Wildlife health risk analysis for conservation translocation: A scalable approach illustrated for wader population restoration

Abstract Conservation translocations are human‐mediated movements of wildlife for conservation purposes. They risk compromising the health of wildlife, and potentially domestic animals and humans, in the short and long term, but these risks vary with project context. Wildlife health risk analysis (disease risk analysis) is a process enabling these risks to be characterized and managed; multiple methods have been developed for conservation translocation. It would be beneficial for the depth of health risk analysis to be proportionate to context; however, few methods currently facilitate this flexibility. We aimed to produce a refined methodological framework for health risk analysis that enabled it to be scalable and adaptable to different translocation scenarios. We developed such a framework by adapting and assimilating elements of existing methods. We describe its key features and application to two wader (shorebird) conservation translocations with differing translocation plans and epidemiological circumstances. We then reflect on the framework's utility in light of the observed project outcomes, which exemplified the uncertain and changeable nature of disease risks over time. Our framework has the potential to expedite health risk analysis for repeat translocations of a particular taxon in a region and has application to other taxa and potentially other forms of wildlife translocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70131
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wildlife health risk analysis for conservation translocation: A scalable approach illustrated for wader population restoration

Michelle F O’Brien, Anthony W. Sainsbury, Katie M. Beckmann, Richard Kock et al.
Conservation Science and Practice
Zoonotic diseases and public health
article

Wildlife health risk analysis for conservation translocation: A scalable approach illustrated for wader population restoration

Michelle F O’Brien, Anthony W. Sainsbury, Katie M. Beckmann, Richard Kock, Ruth Cromie, Trevor Grigg, Wilson Luiz da Costa, Nigel S. Jarrett, Taiana Costa, J.C. Penman, Kate McInnes, Daniel Calvo Carrasco, Nicola Dessi, Rebecca Lee, Rosa Lopez Colom, Baz Hughes
article en

Abstract

Abstract Conservation translocations are human‐mediated movements of wildlife for conservation purposes. They risk compromising the health of wildlife, and potentially domestic animals and humans, in the short and long term, but these risks vary with project context. Wildlife health risk analysis (disease risk analysis) is a process enabling these risks to be characterized and managed; multiple methods have been developed for conservation translocation. It would be beneficial for the depth of health risk analysis to be proportionate to context; however, few methods currently facilitate this flexibility. We aimed to produce a refined methodological framework for health risk analysis that enabled it to be scalable and adaptable to different translocation scenarios. We developed such a framework by adapting and assimilating elements of existing methods. We describe its key features and application to two wader (shorebird) conservation translocations with differing translocation plans and epidemiological circumstances. We then reflect on the framework's utility in light of the observed project outcomes, which exemplified the uncertain and changeable nature of disease risks over time. Our framework has the potential to expedite health risk analysis for repeat translocations of a particular taxon in a region and has application to other taxa and potentially other forms of wildlife translocation.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 7(9)
Zoological Society of London (GB), Royal Veterinary College (GB), Roslin Institute (GB), Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust (GB), Department of Conservation (NZ)
HSBC Bank USA, Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Strong, Natural England, Animal and Plant Health Agency, National Lottery Heritage Fund, Royal Veterinary College
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Zoonotic diseases and public health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.