Transdermal radiofrequency (V ERASER®) plus polidocanol sclerotherapy <i>versus</i> polidocanol sclerotherapy alone for the treatment of reticular veins and telangiectasias. A randomized controlled trial (TYPER trial)

BackgroundSclerotherapy with polidocanol is the gold standard treatment for telangiectasias and varicose veins, but technologies such as transdermal radiofrequency are also available. Transdermal radiofrequency (V Eraser<sup>®)</sup>, a device that combines transdermal radiofrequency and sclerotherapy, was developed to treat these conditions.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, and comparative study between transdermal radiofrequency and sclerotherapy for treating telangiectasias and reticular veins. Forty-one patients were randomized to either transdermal radiofrequency plus polidocanol sclerotherapy or polidocanol sclerotherapy alone and underwent a single treatment session. Efficacy was assessed using vessel clearance analysis in pre- and post-treatment images and the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire.ResultsForty-six patients were enrolled. Both treatments significantly reduced vessel length in a single session (<i>p</i> < .001). Sclerotherapy showed an average reduction of 30.7%, while transdermal radiofrequency reduced it by 33%, with no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = .596). Quality of life improved, with pain reduction in 40% and 55% of patients in the right and left lower limbs, respectively (<i>p</i> = .030 and <i>p</i> = .002).ConclusionTransdermal radiofrequency was not superior to standard of care polidocanol sclerotherapy. Both methods improved quality of life, particularly in reducing pain associated with varicose veins.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251375384
Primary Topic
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transdermal radiofrequency (V ERASER®) plus polidocanol sclerotherapy versus polidocanol sclerotherapy alone for the treatment of reticular veins and telangiectasias. A randomized controlled trial (TYPER trial)

Rodrigo Kikuchi, Caroline Cândida Carvalho de Oliveira, Ariadne Ribeiro Negrão, M. Rodrigues et al.
Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
article

Transdermal radiofrequency (V ERASER®) plus polidocanol sclerotherapy versus polidocanol sclerotherapy alone for the treatment of reticular veins and telangiectasias. A randomized controlled trial (TYPER trial)

Rodrigo Kikuchi, Caroline Cândida Carvalho de Oliveira, Ariadne Ribeiro Negrão, M. Rodrigues, Rafaela Palermo Marcondes, Viviane Santana da Silva, Roberto Augusto Caffaro, Flávia Magalhães Silveira Magella, Camilla Moreira Ribeiro, Fabrício Rodrigues Santiago, Eduardo Ramacciotti, Rafaella de Souza Pereira Rodrigues, Giuliano Giová Volpiani, R Becker, Samantha Neves
article en

Abstract

BackgroundSclerotherapy with polidocanol is the gold standard treatment for telangiectasias and varicose veins, but technologies such as transdermal radiofrequency are also available. Transdermal radiofrequency (V Eraser<sup>®)</sup>, a device that combines transdermal radiofrequency and sclerotherapy, was developed to treat these conditions.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, and comparative study between transdermal radiofrequency and sclerotherapy for treating telangiectasias and reticular veins. Forty-one patients were randomized to either transdermal radiofrequency plus polidocanol sclerotherapy or polidocanol sclerotherapy alone and underwent a single treatment session. Efficacy was assessed using vessel clearance analysis in pre- and post-treatment images and the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire.ResultsForty-six patients were enrolled. Both treatments significantly reduced vessel length in a single session (<i>p</i> < .001). Sclerotherapy showed an average reduction of 30.7%, while transdermal radiofrequency reduced it by 33%, with no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = .596). Quality of life improved, with pain reduction in 40% and 55% of patients in the right and left lower limbs, respectively (<i>p</i> = .030 and <i>p</i> = .002).ConclusionTransdermal radiofrequency was not superior to standard of care polidocanol sclerotherapy. Both methods improved quality of life, particularly in reducing pain associated with varicose veins.

Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (BR), Loyola University Medical Center (US), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (BR), Centro Universitário São Lucas (BR), Los Angeles Clinical Trials (US), Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR), University of Rio Grande and Rio Grande Community College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.