Mind Over Scalpel: Effectiveness of Preoperative Surgical Education

Multimodal preoperative educational interventions, delivered in various formats including written materials, videos, websites, and more, have shown potential in improving postoperative outcomes. Given the evolving landscape of surgical education, the effectiveness of these diverse strategies requires further assessment. This systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis evaluated multimodal preoperative educational interventions and their impact on surgical outcomes. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2005 and 2025 were conducted per PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the effect of preoperative educational interventions on surgical outcomes. RCTs were retrieved from MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases (January 2025). RCTs with >45 adult patients were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to explore the effectiveness of preoperative educational interventions, and a network meta-analysis was further conducted to evaluate the effect of various intervention modalities. For this review, interventions were categorized as human-contact (e.g., in-person education or interactive educational sessions), written materials (e.g., pamphlets or booklets), digital (e.g., websites, videos, or virtual reality), and hybrid (a combination of human interaction and written or digital components). 40 articles comprising 4,113 patients were included. When analyzed via the pairwise meta-analysis, preoperative educational interventions were associated with improvements in length of stay, analgesic use, postoperative pain, anxiety, quality of life, patient satisfaction and knowledge. When evaluated further using the network meta-analysis, human-contact interventions were associated with reduced length of hospital stay (Mean Difference (MD)=-1.01 days, 95%CI:-1.86,-0.16, p=0.02). Both written materials (standardized mean difference (SMD) SMD=-0.82, 95%CI:-1.08,-0.56, p<0.0001) and hybrid interventions (SMD: -0.61, 95%CI:-1.11,-0.11, p=0.02) reduced postoperative analgesic use. Additionally, digital interventions demonstrated improvements in several subjective outcomes including postoperative pain, satisfaction and knowledge, while improvements in quality-of-life were nearing significance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/xcs.0000000000001617
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mind Over Scalpel: Effectiveness of Preoperative Surgical Education

Alpa V. Patel, Kaavian Shariati, A. Perrotta, Marco A. Hidalgo et al.
2 citations
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Surgical Simulation and Training
4.01
article

Mind Over Scalpel: Effectiveness of Preoperative Surgical Education

Alpa V. Patel, Kaavian Shariati, A. Perrotta, Marco A. Hidalgo, Chi‐Hong Tseng, Justine C. Lee, Meghan Miller, Anne Hall, Alexander A. Argame
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Multimodal preoperative educational interventions, delivered in various formats including written materials, videos, websites, and more, have shown potential in improving postoperative outcomes. Given the evolving landscape of surgical education, the effectiveness of these diverse strategies requires further assessment. This systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis evaluated multimodal preoperative educational interventions and their impact on surgical outcomes. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2005 and 2025 were conducted per PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the effect of preoperative educational interventions on surgical outcomes. RCTs were retrieved from MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases (January 2025). RCTs with >45 adult patients were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to explore the effectiveness of preoperative educational interventions, and a network meta-analysis was further conducted to evaluate the effect of various intervention modalities. For this review, interventions were categorized as human-contact (e.g., in-person education or interactive educational sessions), written materials (e.g., pamphlets or booklets), digital (e.g., websites, videos, or virtual reality), and hybrid (a combination of human interaction and written or digital components). 40 articles comprising 4,113 patients were included. When analyzed via the pairwise meta-analysis, preoperative educational interventions were associated with improvements in length of stay, analgesic use, postoperative pain, anxiety, quality of life, patient satisfaction and knowledge. When evaluated further using the network meta-analysis, human-contact interventions were associated with reduced length of hospital stay (Mean Difference (MD)=-1.01 days, 95%CI:-1.86,-0.16, p=0.02). Both written materials (standardized mean difference (SMD) SMD=-0.82, 95%CI:-1.08,-0.56, p<0.0001) and hybrid interventions (SMD: -0.61, 95%CI:-1.11,-0.11, p=0.02) reduced postoperative analgesic use. Additionally, digital interventions demonstrated improvements in several subjective outcomes including postoperative pain, satisfaction and knowledge, while improvements in quality-of-life were nearing significance.

Journal of the American College of SurgeonsVol. 241(6)
Kaiser Permanente (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Surgical Simulation and Training
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.