Using Generalizability Theory to Estimate the Dependability of Individual Cut Scores within Biomedical and Other Assessments

In this brief article, we describe how generalizability theory can be used to derive indices representing the dependability of cut scores used in decision making based on data from one or two occasions. We include an empirical example using the Neuroticism subscale from the Big Five Inventory to illustrate use of these coefficients and how the dependability of cut scores can exceed the overall dependability of scores when considered on whole. We also direct readers to resources with computer code and further information about conducting the illustrated analyses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26717/bjstr.2025.63.009827
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Generalizability Theory to Estimate the Dependability of Individual Cut Scores within Biomedical and Other Assessments

Walter P. Vispoel
1 citations
Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
3.53
article

Using Generalizability Theory to Estimate the Dependability of Individual Cut Scores within Biomedical and Other Assessments

Walter P. Vispoel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this brief article, we describe how generalizability theory can be used to derive indices representing the dependability of cut scores used in decision making based on data from one or two occasions. We include an empirical example using the Neuroticism subscale from the Big Five Inventory to illustrate use of these coefficients and how the dependability of cut scores can exceed the overall dependability of scores when considered on whole. We also direct readers to resources with computer code and further information about conducting the illustrated analyses.

Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical ResearchVol. 63(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
3.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.