Single‐Pulse Nanomorphology Governs Laser‐Induced Periodic Surface Structure Formation on Metals

Abstract The targeted generation of laser‐induced periodic surface structures (LIPSS) is a powerful technique in modern surface engineering. While the dominant role of optical scattering and surface electromagnetic ways in LIPSS formation is widely acknowledged, formation mechanisms still pose open questions, particularly regarding material‐specific differences in uniformity and prominence. Here, a comparative pulse‐to‐pulse analysis of aluminum and stainless steel is presented, chosen to represent relevant metals that develop rough and smooth crater nanomorphologies, respectively, following single‐pulse irradiation. The findings reveal that the initial nanomorphology governs subsequent LIPSS development. After the initial pulse, aluminum forms pronounced spiky nanostructures characterized by elevated local surface gradients within the ablation crater, leading to strong scattering and localization of surface electromagnetic waves. This suppresses periodic intensity distribution and prevents the formation of LIPSS. In contrast, stainless steel retains a smooth crater morphology after the first pulse, enabling well‐defined systematic progression from high‐frequency to low‐frequency LIPSS. Supported by finite‐difference time‐domain simulations on measured surface topographies, the results quantitatively link initial nanomorphology to optical interactions, fundamentally defining material‐dependent pathways for LIPSS formation. Beyond previous explanations relying on macroscopic material parameters, this nanomorphological perspective provides an additional, yet direct explanation for inherent differences in LIPSS susceptibility among various metals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laser & Photonics Review
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202500694
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Laser Material Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Single‐Pulse Nanomorphology Governs Laser‐Induced Periodic Surface Structure Formation on Metals

Maximilian Spellauge, David Redka, H. Huber, Evgeny L. Gurevich et al.
5 citations
Laser & Photonics Review
Laser Material Processing Techniques
6.67
article

Single‐Pulse Nanomorphology Governs Laser‐Induced Periodic Surface Structure Formation on Metals

Maximilian Spellauge, David Redka, H. Huber, Evgeny L. Gurevich, Constanze Eulenkamp, Christian H. Schwalb, Darshit Jangid, N. Thomae
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract The targeted generation of laser‐induced periodic surface structures (LIPSS) is a powerful technique in modern surface engineering. While the dominant role of optical scattering and surface electromagnetic ways in LIPSS formation is widely acknowledged, formation mechanisms still pose open questions, particularly regarding material‐specific differences in uniformity and prominence. Here, a comparative pulse‐to‐pulse analysis of aluminum and stainless steel is presented, chosen to represent relevant metals that develop rough and smooth crater nanomorphologies, respectively, following single‐pulse irradiation. The findings reveal that the initial nanomorphology governs subsequent LIPSS development. After the initial pulse, aluminum forms pronounced spiky nanostructures characterized by elevated local surface gradients within the ablation crater, leading to strong scattering and localization of surface electromagnetic waves. This suppresses periodic intensity distribution and prevents the formation of LIPSS. In contrast, stainless steel retains a smooth crater morphology after the first pulse, enabling well‐defined systematic progression from high‐frequency to low‐frequency LIPSS. Supported by finite‐difference time‐domain simulations on measured surface topographies, the results quantitatively link initial nanomorphology to optical interactions, fundamentally defining material‐dependent pathways for LIPSS formation. Beyond previous explanations relying on macroscopic material parameters, this nanomorphological perspective provides an additional, yet direct explanation for inherent differences in LIPSS susceptibility among various metals.

Laser & Photonics ReviewVol. 20(2)
Munich University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Television and Film Munich (DE), Quantum Design (Germany) (DE), FH Münster University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Laser Material Processing Techniques
6.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.