Requirements for occupational exposure limits in psychosocial risk assessment: What we know, what we don’t know and what we can learn from other disciplines
Based on the limited existing literature, we recommend (i) the use of outcome variables that enable detection of early stages of adverse effects aligned with the no-observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse effect level (LOAEL), (ii) standardization and harmonization of hitherto independent assessments of identical hazards, and (iii) policy-level actions to foster collaborative decision-making based on the full spectrum of scientific evidence.
Authors
- Yacine Taibi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8606-2963)
- Roman Pauli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4845-4880)
- Jessica Lang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7802-8546)
- Yannick A. Metzler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7362-3477)
- Thomas Kraus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9747-3776)
- Andreas Müller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7447-700X)
Institutions
- Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE)
- RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health
- Published
- 2025-09-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4247
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Occupational Health and Safety Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.08