COMBINED ACTION OF ANTISEPTICS WITH LOCAL ANESTHETICS AGAINST MULTIDRUG-RESISTANT STRAINS OF S. AUREUS

The aim of this study was to determine the combined action of the most widely used antiseptics with LAs against MDR strains of S. aureus. Materials and methods. The study used 54 clinical MDR strains of S. aureus, isolated during 2022-2024 from patients with infected wounds. Isolation from patients, final identification of microorganisms and sensitivity of the obtained isolates to antibiotics were performed by standard culture method using an automatic bacteriological analyzer Vitec 2 compact (Biomerioux, France). MDR strains of S. aureus were tested for their sensitivity to antiseptics: 0.05% chlorhexidine bigluconate (CH), 0.02% decamethoxine (DСM), and local anesthetics: 2.0% lidocaine solution, 3.0% mepivacaine solution, 4.0% articaine solution. The sensitivity of selected bacterial cultures to antiseptics and local anesthetics was determined using the standard serial microdilution method with the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The result of determination of combined effect of antiseptics and local anesthetics was evaluated using the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). Results. It was established that the MIC of CH for MDR strains of S. aureus exceeded MIC of DCM significantly in 4 times (p0.0001). The most effective was articaine, that significantly exceeded the antimicrobial activity of lidocaine by 1.5 times (p0.005) and almost twice – of mepivacaine (p0.0001). Conclusions. The FIIC of the combined effect of CH with lidocaine and mepivacaine indicated their indifferent combined effect with the antiseptic. A similar trend was observed when determining the sensitivity of S. aureus strains to the combination of DCM with local anesthetics. The combinations of CH and DCM with articaine separately contribute to a decrease in the MIC of antiseptics for the studied bacterial strains, indicating their additive antimicrobial combined effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Medical and Ecological Problems
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31718/mep.2025.29.2.06
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial agents and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMBINED ACTION OF ANTISEPTICS WITH LOCAL ANESTHETICS AGAINST MULTIDRUG-RESISTANT STRAINS OF S. AUREUS

Олександр Назарчук, M. O. Faustova, Галина Андріївна Лобань, O. A. Shlykova
The Medical and Ecological Problems
Antimicrobial agents and applications
article

COMBINED ACTION OF ANTISEPTICS WITH LOCAL ANESTHETICS AGAINST MULTIDRUG-RESISTANT STRAINS OF S. AUREUS

Олександр Назарчук, M. O. Faustova, Галина Андріївна Лобань, O. A. Shlykova
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the combined action of the most widely used antiseptics with LAs against MDR strains of S. aureus. Materials and methods. The study used 54 clinical MDR strains of S. aureus, isolated during 2022-2024 from patients with infected wounds. Isolation from patients, final identification of microorganisms and sensitivity of the obtained isolates to antibiotics were performed by standard culture method using an automatic bacteriological analyzer Vitec 2 compact (Biomerioux, France). MDR strains of S. aureus were tested for their sensitivity to antiseptics: 0.05% chlorhexidine bigluconate (CH), 0.02% decamethoxine (DСM), and local anesthetics: 2.0% lidocaine solution, 3.0% mepivacaine solution, 4.0% articaine solution. The sensitivity of selected bacterial cultures to antiseptics and local anesthetics was determined using the standard serial microdilution method with the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The result of determination of combined effect of antiseptics and local anesthetics was evaluated using the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). Results. It was established that the MIC of CH for MDR strains of S. aureus exceeded MIC of DCM significantly in 4 times (p0.0001). The most effective was articaine, that significantly exceeded the antimicrobial activity of lidocaine by 1.5 times (p0.005) and almost twice – of mepivacaine (p0.0001). Conclusions. The FIIC of the combined effect of CH with lidocaine and mepivacaine indicated their indifferent combined effect with the antiseptic. A similar trend was observed when determining the sensitivity of S. aureus strains to the combination of DCM with local anesthetics. The combinations of CH and DCM with articaine separately contribute to a decrease in the MIC of antiseptics for the studied bacterial strains, indicating their additive antimicrobial combined effects.

The Medical and Ecological ProblemsVol. 29(2)
Poltava V.G. Korolenko National Pedagogical University (UA), National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya (UA), Poltava State Medical University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Antimicrobial agents and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.