An assessment of pesticide residues in tomatoes sold in selected markets in Zimbabwe

This study was conducted to evaluate pesticide residue levels in locally produced and sold tomatoes in Zimbabwe. A total of 91 tomato samples were randomly collected from horticultural and retail markets and analysed for pesticide residues using Gas Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. The samples were obtained from Harare Metropolitan, Mashonaland West, Mashonaland East, and Midlands Provinces. Pesticide residues were detected in 56% of the analysed samples, with 27.5% exceeding the maximum residue levels (MRLs) set by the European Union (EU), 18.7% exceeding Japanese MRLs, 4.4% surpassing Russian MRLs, 1.1% exceeding USA MRLs, and none exceeding the Codex Alimentarius Commission MRLs. The most commonly detected pesticides were profenofos (9.9%), flubendiamide (9.9%), acetamiprid (9.9%), imidacloprid (8.8%), fenbutatin-oxide (7.7%), and lambda-cyhalothrin (6.6%). Multiple pesticide residues were present in 20.9% of the samples, with 3.3% showing more than three residues. The frequency of pesticide residue detection varied significantly across the four sampled provinces (χ² = 1.26, df = 3, p < 0.05). These findings indicate widespread pesticide use among tomato farmers, underscoring the importance of monitoring pesticide residues in tomatoes. They also highlight the need to promote sustainable pesticide management practices, particularly adherence to recommended pre-harvest intervals. Key words: Maximum residue limits, pesticide residues, tomatoes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Agricultural Research
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5897/ajar2025.16973
Primary Topic
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An assessment of pesticide residues in tomatoes sold in selected markets in Zimbabwe

Constanze Carl, Mitch J. Duncan, Chipere Kenneth, Mujaju Claid et al.
African Journal of Agricultural Research
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
article

An assessment of pesticide residues in tomatoes sold in selected markets in Zimbabwe

Constanze Carl, Mitch J. Duncan, Chipere Kenneth, Mujaju Claid, Matyora Taurai
article en

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate pesticide residue levels in locally produced and sold tomatoes in Zimbabwe. A total of 91 tomato samples were randomly collected from horticultural and retail markets and analysed for pesticide residues using Gas Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. The samples were obtained from Harare Metropolitan, Mashonaland West, Mashonaland East, and Midlands Provinces. Pesticide residues were detected in 56% of the analysed samples, with 27.5% exceeding the maximum residue levels (MRLs) set by the European Union (EU), 18.7% exceeding Japanese MRLs, 4.4% surpassing Russian MRLs, 1.1% exceeding USA MRLs, and none exceeding the Codex Alimentarius Commission MRLs. The most commonly detected pesticides were profenofos (9.9%), flubendiamide (9.9%), acetamiprid (9.9%), imidacloprid (8.8%), fenbutatin-oxide (7.7%), and lambda-cyhalothrin (6.6%). Multiple pesticide residues were present in 20.9% of the samples, with 3.3% showing more than three residues. The frequency of pesticide residue detection varied significantly across the four sampled provinces (χ² = 1.26, df = 3, p < 0.05). These findings indicate widespread pesticide use among tomato farmers, underscoring the importance of monitoring pesticide residues in tomatoes. They also highlight the need to promote sustainable pesticide management practices, particularly adherence to recommended pre-harvest intervals. Key words: Maximum residue limits, pesticide residues, tomatoes.

African Journal of Agricultural ResearchVol. 21(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.