Recruiting and Consenting Decentralized Clinical Trial Participants—Learnings from the Trials@Home <scp>RADIAL</scp> Proof‐of‐Concept Trial

Clinical trials often face recruitment challenges. From the participant's perspective, barriers such as time commitment, travel to sites, and logistical burden, like arranging care duties or time off work, can deter enrolment. Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) aim to address these by shifting activities closer to participants' homes and using online methods for recruitment and consent. This study explores recruitment strategies and remote eConsent implementation in a decentralized setting. The RADIAL trial, a three-arm, open-label, phase IV study in six European countries, enrolled participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus administering Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml. Recruitment strategies included online campaigns, search engine advertising, social media, and research database outreach. The remote consent process involved eConsent, telemedicine consultations, eIdentification, and eSignatures. Online recruitment campaigns generated a lot of impressions but led to very few pre-screener completions or enrolments. In contrast, outreach through research databases proved more effective, accounting for 7 of the 8 enrolled participants in the decentralized arm. Major pre-screening drop-off occurred at the initial consent step, with 69% exiting before data collection. Eleven participants successfully completed eConsent; 4 others required remote paper-based consent due to eIdentification issues. Implementing the multimedia-enhanced eConsent system was resource-intensive, complicated by country-specific layouts and differing regulatory requirements. Tailored recruitment strategies and simplified remote consent processes are needed to enhance the accessibility and efficiency of DCTs. Further research should optimize targeting and keyword use in online recruitment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70042
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recruiting and Consenting Decentralized Clinical Trial Participants—Learnings from the Trials@Home RADIAL Proof‐of‐Concept Trial

Diederick E. Grobbee, Sébastien Dupont, Bart Lagerwaard, Mira G. P. Zuidgeest et al.
6 citations
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Ethics in Clinical Research
11.27
article

Recruiting and Consenting Decentralized Clinical Trial Participants—Learnings from the Trials@Home RADIAL Proof‐of‐Concept Trial

Diederick E. Grobbee, Sébastien Dupont, Bart Lagerwaard, Mira G. P. Zuidgeest, Richard T. Davey, Jaime Fons‐Martínez, Katarzyna Lipinska, Linda Rutgrink, Danny van Weelij, Tina Bornemann
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Clinical trials often face recruitment challenges. From the participant's perspective, barriers such as time commitment, travel to sites, and logistical burden, like arranging care duties or time off work, can deter enrolment. Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) aim to address these by shifting activities closer to participants' homes and using online methods for recruitment and consent. This study explores recruitment strategies and remote eConsent implementation in a decentralized setting. The RADIAL trial, a three-arm, open-label, phase IV study in six European countries, enrolled participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus administering Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml. Recruitment strategies included online campaigns, search engine advertising, social media, and research database outreach. The remote consent process involved eConsent, telemedicine consultations, eIdentification, and eSignatures. Online recruitment campaigns generated a lot of impressions but led to very few pre-screener completions or enrolments. In contrast, outreach through research databases proved more effective, accounting for 7 of the 8 enrolled participants in the decentralized arm. Major pre-screening drop-off occurred at the initial consent step, with 69% exiting before data collection. Eleven participants successfully completed eConsent; 4 others required remote paper-based consent due to eIdentification issues. Implementing the multimedia-enhanced eConsent system was resource-intensive, complicated by country-specific layouts and differing regulatory requirements. Tailored recruitment strategies and simplified remote consent processes are needed to enhance the accessibility and efficiency of DCTs. Further research should optimize targeting and keyword use in online recruitment.

Clinical Pharmacology & TherapeuticsVol. 118(5)
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), International Diabetes Federation (BE), Sanofi (Netherlands) (NL), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (ES), Cambridge Cognition (United Kingdom) (GB), Fresenius Kabi (Netherlands) (NL), Yulius (NL), UCB Pharma (Germany) (DE)
European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics in Clinical Research
11.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.