Caster Semenya succeeds in an important case for athletes around the world at the European Court of Human Rights regarding the right of athletes to a fair hearing during fundamental rights disputes between themselves and their sport governing bodies

In the case of Semenya v Switzerland, the European Court of Human Rights held that when athletes complain to their sport’s governing bodies regarding regulations that undermine their human rights, which such bodies claim are compatible with substantive public policy, the arbitration or reviewing bodies must rigorously – and not restrictively – examine the breaches of the athletes’ fundamental rights before deciding a case. This decision should result in important changes to the governance of international sport.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South African Journal of Bioethics and Law
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7196/sajbl.2025.v18i2.3975
Primary Topic
Doping in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Caster Semenya succeeds in an important case for athletes around the world at the European Court of Human Rights regarding the right of athletes to a fair hearing during fundamental rights disputes between themselves and their sport governing bodies

David McQuoid–Mason
South African Journal of Bioethics and Law
Doping in Sports
article

Caster Semenya succeeds in an important case for athletes around the world at the European Court of Human Rights regarding the right of athletes to a fair hearing during fundamental rights disputes between themselves and their sport governing bodies

David McQuoid–Mason
article en

Abstract

In the case of Semenya v Switzerland, the European Court of Human Rights held that when athletes complain to their sport’s governing bodies regarding regulations that undermine their human rights, which such bodies claim are compatible with substantive public policy, the arbitration or reviewing bodies must rigorously – and not restrictively – examine the breaches of the athletes’ fundamental rights before deciding a case. This decision should result in important changes to the governance of international sport.

South African Journal of Bioethics and Law
University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Doping in Sports
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.