Assistive technology for higher education students with disabilities: Knowledge and skills of teaching staff

The use of assistive technology in education has been shown to enhance academic performance, increase educational engagement, and improve both academic self-efficacy and the social and psychological well-being of students with disabilities. Despite these proven benefits, assistive technology is not always utilized systematically or effectively. Many educators report feeling insufficiently competent in using assistive technology in the classroom, with their knowledge often being limited. This study aimed to assess higher education teaching staff's knowledge of the features of both assistive and mainstream technology (including devices, software, and apps), as well as their experience in using them. A total of 131 teaching staff members from Italy, Germany, Spain, and Greece participated in the study by completing a questionnaire that included items related to both types of technology. The results indicated that staff members were far more familiar with mainstream technology than with assistive technology, and their knowledge and experience with the latter were limited. Age and prior training emerged as significant predictors of both knowledge and use of assistive technology. Notably, the study highlighted specific types of assistive technology that were more familiar to higher education teaching staff.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Assistive Technology
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2025.2548564
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assistive technology for higher education students with disabilities: Knowledge and skills of teaching staff

José Manuel Castellano Gil, Vasiliki Giannouli, Konstantinos Papadopoulos, Rafael Molina-Carmona et al.
Assistive Technology
Disability Education and Employment
article

Assistive technology for higher education students with disabilities: Knowledge and skills of teaching staff

José Manuel Castellano Gil, Vasiliki Giannouli, Konstantinos Papadopoulos, Rafael Molina-Carmona, Flavio Manganello, Elena Chronopoulou, Eleni Koustriava, Lisander Isaraj, Theofilos Papadopoulos
article en

Abstract

The use of assistive technology in education has been shown to enhance academic performance, increase educational engagement, and improve both academic self-efficacy and the social and psychological well-being of students with disabilities. Despite these proven benefits, assistive technology is not always utilized systematically or effectively. Many educators report feeling insufficiently competent in using assistive technology in the classroom, with their knowledge often being limited. This study aimed to assess higher education teaching staff's knowledge of the features of both assistive and mainstream technology (including devices, software, and apps), as well as their experience in using them. A total of 131 teaching staff members from Italy, Germany, Spain, and Greece participated in the study by completing a questionnaire that included items related to both types of technology. The results indicated that staff members were far more familiar with mainstream technology than with assistive technology, and their knowledge and experience with the latter were limited. Age and prior training emerged as significant predictors of both knowledge and use of assistive technology. Notably, the study highlighted specific types of assistive technology that were more familiar to higher education teaching staff.

Assistive Technology
University of Alicante (ES), University of Macedonia (GR), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Erasmus+
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Disability Education and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.