Student Perceptions of Cognitive, Psychomotor and Affective Learning in the Undergraduate Laboratory

Biochemistry and molecular biology is an experimental discipline and therefore training students in experimental techniques and data analysis is an essential component of undergraduate degrees. However, the amount of practical work may be limited by financial constraints and can vary considerably in the quality of the student experience. We were interested in how students perceived their overall practical experience, in contrast to evaluating a single experiment or project. We surveyed second-year students on their confidence in practical skills and what they valued and found challenging in laboratory work, followed by a small number of interviews. We found that students generally have a high level of confidence in their abilities and recognize a wide range of learning outcomes, encompassing the cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains of learning. What students identify as challenging is similarly diverse. Most did not believe that online experiences were a good substitute for in-person laboratories. The implications of this research are that scaffolding of practical work should accommodate the diversity of student experience and that assessment should take better account of psychomotor and affective learning, rather than relying solely on demonstration of cognitive learning via a laboratory report.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.70011
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Student Perceptions of Cognitive, Psychomotor and Affective Learning in the Undergraduate Laboratory

Susan M. Howitt, Lauren M. Crean, Alexandra Cleaver
1 citations
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education
Innovative Teaching Methods
8.93
article

Student Perceptions of Cognitive, Psychomotor and Affective Learning in the Undergraduate Laboratory

Susan M. Howitt, Lauren M. Crean, Alexandra Cleaver
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Biochemistry and molecular biology is an experimental discipline and therefore training students in experimental techniques and data analysis is an essential component of undergraduate degrees. However, the amount of practical work may be limited by financial constraints and can vary considerably in the quality of the student experience. We were interested in how students perceived their overall practical experience, in contrast to evaluating a single experiment or project. We surveyed second-year students on their confidence in practical skills and what they valued and found challenging in laboratory work, followed by a small number of interviews. We found that students generally have a high level of confidence in their abilities and recognize a wide range of learning outcomes, encompassing the cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains of learning. What students identify as challenging is similarly diverse. Most did not believe that online experiences were a good substitute for in-person laboratories. The implications of this research are that scaffolding of practical work should accommodate the diversity of student experience and that assessment should take better account of psychomotor and affective learning, rather than relying solely on demonstration of cognitive learning via a laboratory report.

Biochemistry and Molecular Biology EducationVol. 53(6)
Australian National University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Innovative Teaching Methods
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.