Comparison of immunogenicity and protection efficacy of self-amplifying and circular mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2

Recent advances in vaccine technology have positioned messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines as safe and reliable options for human use. Conventionally, mRNA vaccines were designed using linear or self-amplifying mRNA (SAM), the latter considered to be superior. Subsequent studies on Circular mRNA (Circ-RNA) vaccines proved their efficacy. Here, we compared the efficacy of SAM- and Circ-RNA vaccines using the SARS-CoV-2-RBD (receptor binding domain) antigen. Both SAM-RBD and Circ-RBD induced a comparable anti-RBD IgG titer and virus-neutralizing antibody titer. However, the latter induced a higher memory T cell response. The Circ-RBD vaccine is stable for 4 weeks at 4°C. A bivalent vaccine containing Circ-RBD of both delta and omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants potently neutralized these viruses. These findings demonstrate Circ-RNA-RBD as an excellent vaccine candidate against COVID-19 and also provide a platform for developing bivalent Circ-RNA vaccine candidates against SARS-CoV-2 or other viruses with rapidly emerging variants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113498
Citations
2
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of immunogenicity and protection efficacy of self-amplifying and circular mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2

C. T. Ranjith-Kumar, Milan Surjit, Tripti Shrivastava, Shailendra Mani et al.
2 citations
iScience
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
2.79
article

Comparison of immunogenicity and protection efficacy of self-amplifying and circular mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2

C. T. Ranjith-Kumar, Milan Surjit, Tripti Shrivastava, Shailendra Mani, Tejeswara Rao Asuru, Debasis Nayak, Gaurav Batra, Oinam Ningthemmani Singh, Souvick Chattopadhyay, Umang Berry, Sriram Narayanan, Garima Joshi, Mahima Tiwari, Puneet Srivastava, Prasenjit Guchhait, Kannan Chandrasekar, Bhisma Narayan Panda, Farha Mehdi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Recent advances in vaccine technology have positioned messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines as safe and reliable options for human use. Conventionally, mRNA vaccines were designed using linear or self-amplifying mRNA (SAM), the latter considered to be superior. Subsequent studies on Circular mRNA (Circ-RNA) vaccines proved their efficacy. Here, we compared the efficacy of SAM- and Circ-RNA vaccines using the SARS-CoV-2-RBD (receptor binding domain) antigen. Both SAM-RBD and Circ-RBD induced a comparable anti-RBD IgG titer and virus-neutralizing antibody titer. However, the latter induced a higher memory T cell response. The Circ-RBD vaccine is stable for 4 weeks at 4°C. A bivalent vaccine containing Circ-RBD of both delta and omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants potently neutralized these viruses. These findings demonstrate Circ-RNA-RBD as an excellent vaccine candidate against COVID-19 and also provide a platform for developing bivalent Circ-RNA vaccine candidates against SARS-CoV-2 or other viruses with rapidly emerging variants.

iScienceVol. 28(10)
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (IN), Translational Health Science and Technology Institute (IN), Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal (IN), Regional Centre for Biotechnology (IN)
Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.