Biochar Application Methods Matter: Biochemical and Enological Responses of an Italian Field-Grown Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Using Solid and Liquid Formulations

Viticulture is increasingly seeking sustainable practices that enhance grape quality while reducing reliance on synthetic inputs. Among bio-based strategies, biochar has attracted growing interest for its potential to improve soil fertility and influence plant metabolism. However, its effects can vary depending on formulation and application methods. This study evaluated the effects of the use of solid (SB) and liquid biochar (LB) on the biochemical and nutritional composition in leaves, berry skins, and must of a grapevine (Vitis vinifera L., cv. Sangiovese) cultivated in a vineyard in Tuscany (Italy). SB was applied once to the soil at 2.5% (w/w), while LB was applied five times/season at 10% (v/v) via fertigation. Results revealed formulation-specific effects on grapevine physiology and fruit composition. SB maintained leaf chlorophyll concentrations, increased total soluble proteins (+65%), total polyphenols (+57%), and tannin content (+33%) in berry skins and must, and reduced Cu and Zn. Conversely, LB reduced leaf chlorophyll concentrations (−24%) and nutrient contents (P, Fe, Cu, and Zn), but increased total flavonoids (+13%), antioxidant capacity (+20%), and vitamin C (+18%) in berry skins, alongside higher fructose and reducing sugars in musts. The findings highlight biochar’s potential as a bio-based input in viticulture, emphasizing the importance of formulation and application strategy. SB appears suited to long-term soil improvement and enhanced phenolic richness, while LB may modulate sugar metabolism for targeted enological outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15092124
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biochar Application Methods Matter: Biochemical and Enological Responses of an Italian Field-Grown Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Using Solid and Liquid Formulations

Silvia Celletti, Riccardo Fedeli, Stefano Loppi
3 citations
Agronomy
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
5.25
article

Biochar Application Methods Matter: Biochemical and Enological Responses of an Italian Field-Grown Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Using Solid and Liquid Formulations

Silvia Celletti, Riccardo Fedeli, Stefano Loppi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Viticulture is increasingly seeking sustainable practices that enhance grape quality while reducing reliance on synthetic inputs. Among bio-based strategies, biochar has attracted growing interest for its potential to improve soil fertility and influence plant metabolism. However, its effects can vary depending on formulation and application methods. This study evaluated the effects of the use of solid (SB) and liquid biochar (LB) on the biochemical and nutritional composition in leaves, berry skins, and must of a grapevine (Vitis vinifera L., cv. Sangiovese) cultivated in a vineyard in Tuscany (Italy). SB was applied once to the soil at 2.5% (w/w), while LB was applied five times/season at 10% (v/v) via fertigation. Results revealed formulation-specific effects on grapevine physiology and fruit composition. SB maintained leaf chlorophyll concentrations, increased total soluble proteins (+65%), total polyphenols (+57%), and tannin content (+33%) in berry skins and must, and reduced Cu and Zn. Conversely, LB reduced leaf chlorophyll concentrations (−24%) and nutrient contents (P, Fe, Cu, and Zn), but increased total flavonoids (+13%), antioxidant capacity (+20%), and vitamin C (+18%) in berry skins, alongside higher fructose and reducing sugars in musts. The findings highlight biochar’s potential as a bio-based input in viticulture, emphasizing the importance of formulation and application strategy. SB appears suited to long-term soil improvement and enhanced phenolic richness, while LB may modulate sugar metabolism for targeted enological outcomes.

AgronomyVol. 15(9)
University of Siena (IT), National Biodiversity Institute (CR), University of Turin (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
5.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.