A literature review-based evaluation framework for maintenance strategy selection in heavy vehicles

• A decision-support framework is proposed for selecting maintenance strategies in mining truck fleets. • The model is based on a critical synthesis of literature and integrates practical operational factors. • Strategies are evaluated in terms of data availability, diagnostic capability, system criticality, and resource constraints. • The first decision tree helps classify maintenance strategies based on operational and technical constraints. • The second decision tree maps available resources and data maturity to suitable analytical methods. Effective maintenance strategies are critical for ensuring operational reliability, minimizing downtime, and optimizing resource utilization in fleet-based industrial operations. Among these, mining truck fleets represent a particularly high-risk, high-cost context where equipment failures can lead to substantial productivity losses and safety hazards. Despite the operational importance, existing literature lacks a structured framework to guide maintenance strategy selection that considers the practical constraints of data availability, diagnostic capability, and operational variability. To address this gap, this study proposes an evaluation framework that supports the selection and implementation of appropriate maintenance strategies. The framework is developed through a critical literature analysis, which is synthesized using a Frame of References approach. Unlike generic taxonomies, this model classifies maintenance strategies based on decision logic, response timing, data dependency, required infrastructure, and alignment with organizational capabilities. Building upon this structure, a two-level decision-support framework is introduced. The first decision tree assists practitioners in determining the appropriate class of maintenance strategy—corrective, planned, proactive, or predictive—based on operational constraints and system criticality. The second tree refines this selection by mapping available technological resources and data maturity to suitable analytical methods (e.g., rule-based, statistical, or AI-driven). While the framework is demonstrated in the context of mining truck operations, its modular design makes it applicable to other asset-intensive sectors, including logistics, construction, and heavy manufacturing. By bridging analytical insights with real-world constraints, this study offers a practical tool for organizations seeking to develop scalable, reliable, and context-sensitive maintenance strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107109
Primary Topic
Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A literature review-based evaluation framework for maintenance strategy selection in heavy vehicles

Behzad Ghodrati, Malihe Goli, Nick Eleftheroglou
Results in Engineering
Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
article

A literature review-based evaluation framework for maintenance strategy selection in heavy vehicles

Behzad Ghodrati, Malihe Goli, Nick Eleftheroglou
article en

Abstract

• A decision-support framework is proposed for selecting maintenance strategies in mining truck fleets. • The model is based on a critical synthesis of literature and integrates practical operational factors. • Strategies are evaluated in terms of data availability, diagnostic capability, system criticality, and resource constraints. • The first decision tree helps classify maintenance strategies based on operational and technical constraints. • The second decision tree maps available resources and data maturity to suitable analytical methods. Effective maintenance strategies are critical for ensuring operational reliability, minimizing downtime, and optimizing resource utilization in fleet-based industrial operations. Among these, mining truck fleets represent a particularly high-risk, high-cost context where equipment failures can lead to substantial productivity losses and safety hazards. Despite the operational importance, existing literature lacks a structured framework to guide maintenance strategy selection that considers the practical constraints of data availability, diagnostic capability, and operational variability. To address this gap, this study proposes an evaluation framework that supports the selection and implementation of appropriate maintenance strategies. The framework is developed through a critical literature analysis, which is synthesized using a Frame of References approach. Unlike generic taxonomies, this model classifies maintenance strategies based on decision logic, response timing, data dependency, required infrastructure, and alignment with organizational capabilities. Building upon this structure, a two-level decision-support framework is introduced. The first decision tree assists practitioners in determining the appropriate class of maintenance strategy—corrective, planned, proactive, or predictive—based on operational constraints and system criticality. The second tree refines this selection by mapping available technological resources and data maturity to suitable analytical methods (e.g., rule-based, statistical, or AI-driven). While the framework is demonstrated in the context of mining truck operations, its modular design makes it applicable to other asset-intensive sectors, including logistics, construction, and heavy manufacturing. By bridging analytical insights with real-world constraints, this study offers a practical tool for organizations seeking to develop scalable, reliable, and context-sensitive maintenance strategies.

Results in EngineeringVol. 28
Luleå University of Technology (SE), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.