Evaluation of Leading Modes of North American Summer Heatwave Variability in CMIP6 Models

Abstract This study evaluates 33 CMIP6 GCMs for their ability to simulate the dominant modes of heatwave variability (monthly maximum 3‐day temperatures) during extended summers (June–September 1961–2010) across North America (NA) and associated teleconnections with the North Pacific and regional processes affecting formation. By applying common Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis to three global reanalysis data sets, combined with Common Basis Function (CBF) approach for the GCMs, a unified framework for evaluating performance is established. Two distinct leading modes of monthly summer heatwave variability over NA–dipole and tripole patterns–are identified using the common EOF. The GCMs reproduce these modes, showing agreement in the centers of positive and negative anomalies with the reanalysis data sets, particularly when evaluated using the CBF approach. The GCMs capture large‐scale North Pacific to North American wave train patterns associated with the two modes of heatwave variability over NA, showing a phase shift between them. They reproduce atmospheric moisture conditions, such as total column water vapor and precipitation; however, performance in capturing these anomalies is lower due to the complexities of moisture transport and convection. The GCMs also effectively reproduce regional‐scale surface radiation and turbulent heat flux anomalies related to heatwave variability. Ensemble means of the GCMs generally outperform individual models, highlighting the advantages of multi‐model ensembles in reducing uncertainty and improving overall accuracy. Higher‐resolution models outperform lower‐resolution counterparts in capturing the intricate details of heatwave variability and associated processes, underscoring the importance of resolution in achieving accurate simulations of these extremes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jd042826
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Leading Modes of North American Summer Heatwave Variability in CMIP6 Models

Bin Yu, Alex J. Cannon, Dae Il Jeong
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Climate variability and models
article

Evaluation of Leading Modes of North American Summer Heatwave Variability in CMIP6 Models

Bin Yu, Alex J. Cannon, Dae Il Jeong
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluates 33 CMIP6 GCMs for their ability to simulate the dominant modes of heatwave variability (monthly maximum 3‐day temperatures) during extended summers (June–September 1961–2010) across North America (NA) and associated teleconnections with the North Pacific and regional processes affecting formation. By applying common Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis to three global reanalysis data sets, combined with Common Basis Function (CBF) approach for the GCMs, a unified framework for evaluating performance is established. Two distinct leading modes of monthly summer heatwave variability over NA–dipole and tripole patterns–are identified using the common EOF. The GCMs reproduce these modes, showing agreement in the centers of positive and negative anomalies with the reanalysis data sets, particularly when evaluated using the CBF approach. The GCMs capture large‐scale North Pacific to North American wave train patterns associated with the two modes of heatwave variability over NA, showing a phase shift between them. They reproduce atmospheric moisture conditions, such as total column water vapor and precipitation; however, performance in capturing these anomalies is lower due to the complexities of moisture transport and convection. The GCMs also effectively reproduce regional‐scale surface radiation and turbulent heat flux anomalies related to heatwave variability. Ensemble means of the GCMs generally outperform individual models, highlighting the advantages of multi‐model ensembles in reducing uncertainty and improving overall accuracy. Higher‐resolution models outperform lower‐resolution counterparts in capturing the intricate details of heatwave variability and associated processes, underscoring the importance of resolution in achieving accurate simulations of these extremes.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 130(17)
Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.