How Do Carbon Market and Fossil Energy Market Affect Each Other During the COVID-19, Russia–Ukraine War and Israeli–Palestinian Conflict?

Despite the close linkage between carbon markets and fossil fuel markets, minimal research has investigated their co-movement dynamics during times of heightened geopolitical instability and public health crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, Israeli–Palestinian conflict, and the Russia–Ukraine war. Most studies use conditional mean regression models for testing linear Granger causality, which falls short in assessing time-varying causal relationships. This paper employs a time-varying Granger causality framework to examine the dynamic linkages between fossil fuel markets and carbon markets across multiple time horizons. This methodology enables the evaluation of causal relationships that evolve over time, providing deeper insights into how the carbon market interacts with traditional fossil fuel markets. The study examines causal linkages among carbon, coal, and oil prices from 2 January 2018 to 11 July 2025, using data from Wind Database. The findings reveal a short-lived yet highly significant bidirectional causality between the carbon and fossil fuel markets during the COVID-19 period, whereas a sustained and highly significant bidirectional causal relationship emerges after the onset of the Russia–Ukraine war. During the outbreak of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, this linkage continued without major disruptions or directional shifts. Furthermore, the recursive evolution approach, based on variable sub-window sizes, detects additional evidence of significant bidirectional causal relationships among carbon, coal, and oil prices. These discoveries can serve as valuable inputs for investors and policymakers, enabling them to make informed decisions that protect their interests and ensure market stability. Additionally, coal prices showed greater persistence than oil prices in these bidirectional causal links.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18174724
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Carbon Market and Fossil Energy Market Affect Each Other During the COVID-19, Russia–Ukraine War and Israeli–Palestinian Conflict?

D. Liu, Jierui Zhang, Wei Jiang, Wei Hua et al.
1 links
Energies
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

How Do Carbon Market and Fossil Energy Market Affect Each Other During the COVID-19, Russia–Ukraine War and Israeli–Palestinian Conflict?

D. Liu, Jierui Zhang, Wei Jiang, Wei Hua, Xiangyu Liu
article en

Abstract

Despite the close linkage between carbon markets and fossil fuel markets, minimal research has investigated their co-movement dynamics during times of heightened geopolitical instability and public health crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, Israeli–Palestinian conflict, and the Russia–Ukraine war. Most studies use conditional mean regression models for testing linear Granger causality, which falls short in assessing time-varying causal relationships. This paper employs a time-varying Granger causality framework to examine the dynamic linkages between fossil fuel markets and carbon markets across multiple time horizons. This methodology enables the evaluation of causal relationships that evolve over time, providing deeper insights into how the carbon market interacts with traditional fossil fuel markets. The study examines causal linkages among carbon, coal, and oil prices from 2 January 2018 to 11 July 2025, using data from Wind Database. The findings reveal a short-lived yet highly significant bidirectional causality between the carbon and fossil fuel markets during the COVID-19 period, whereas a sustained and highly significant bidirectional causal relationship emerges after the onset of the Russia–Ukraine war. During the outbreak of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, this linkage continued without major disruptions or directional shifts. Furthermore, the recursive evolution approach, based on variable sub-window sizes, detects additional evidence of significant bidirectional causal relationships among carbon, coal, and oil prices. These discoveries can serve as valuable inputs for investors and policymakers, enabling them to make informed decisions that protect their interests and ensure market stability. Additionally, coal prices showed greater persistence than oil prices in these bidirectional causal links.

EnergiesVol. 18(17)
Qingdao University (CN), Qilu University of Technology (CN), Jinan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.