Do the legal and expert power of auditors enhance financial statement comparability? Evidence from audit fee premiums in Taiwan

Purpose This study aims to investigate whether auditors with legal power (positional authority within accounting firms) and expert power (industry-specific expertise) can enhance the comparability of financial statements. It further examines whether auditors who charge audit fee premiums – reflecting perceived quality – can leverage their power to improve the quality of audited financial information. Design/methodology/approach Using data from listed companies in Taiwan between 2011 and 2021, this study categorizes auditors based on their legal and expert power and analyzes their influence on financial statement comparability. It incorporates Taiwan’s unique dual-signature audit system and considers the interaction between auditor power and audit fee premiums using empirical regression models. Findings The results show that both legal and expert power of auditors are positively associated with financial statement comparability. However, only primary signing auditors with expert power significantly enhance comparability when combined with audit fee premiums. This suggests that industry expertise, rather than hierarchical position, plays a more critical role in improving audit quality. Additionally, the study highlights differences in incentives between primary and secondary auditors under Taiwan’s dual-signature system, which may lead to varying audit outcomes. Originality/value This study is the first to incorporate legal power at the individual auditor level, expanding the audit quality literature beyond firm-level characteristics. It distinguishes between legal and expert power, showing that expert power has a stronger impact on enhancing financial statement comparability. By considering Taiwan’s dual-signature system, the study offers new insights into auditor roles and incentives, providing valuable guidance for companies in auditor selection and for regulators concerned with audit quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Review of Accounting
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ara-10-2024-0314
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do the legal and expert power of auditors enhance financial statement comparability? Evidence from audit fee premiums in Taiwan

Wei-Ju Chen, Lilin Liu, Yu‐Shan Chang
1 links
Asian Review of Accounting
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Do the legal and expert power of auditors enhance financial statement comparability? Evidence from audit fee premiums in Taiwan

Wei-Ju Chen, Lilin Liu, Yu‐Shan Chang
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate whether auditors with legal power (positional authority within accounting firms) and expert power (industry-specific expertise) can enhance the comparability of financial statements. It further examines whether auditors who charge audit fee premiums – reflecting perceived quality – can leverage their power to improve the quality of audited financial information. Design/methodology/approach Using data from listed companies in Taiwan between 2011 and 2021, this study categorizes auditors based on their legal and expert power and analyzes their influence on financial statement comparability. It incorporates Taiwan’s unique dual-signature audit system and considers the interaction between auditor power and audit fee premiums using empirical regression models. Findings The results show that both legal and expert power of auditors are positively associated with financial statement comparability. However, only primary signing auditors with expert power significantly enhance comparability when combined with audit fee premiums. This suggests that industry expertise, rather than hierarchical position, plays a more critical role in improving audit quality. Additionally, the study highlights differences in incentives between primary and secondary auditors under Taiwan’s dual-signature system, which may lead to varying audit outcomes. Originality/value This study is the first to incorporate legal power at the individual auditor level, expanding the audit quality literature beyond firm-level characteristics. It distinguishes between legal and expert power, showing that expert power has a stronger impact on enhancing financial statement comparability. By considering Taiwan’s dual-signature system, the study offers new insights into auditor roles and incentives, providing valuable guidance for companies in auditor selection and for regulators concerned with audit quality.

Asian Review of AccountingVol. 34(2)
Tamkang University (TW), California State University, Dominguez Hills (US), College of Accounting (SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.